this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)
Economy
2783 readers
108 users here now
Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Edit: So this is a bot account - Lemmy RSS PyBot is a powerful Python bot that reads RSS feeds and posts new articles to your favorite Lemmy communities. Stay updated with the latest news, blogs, and articles time-efficiently.
This is a weak argument because it's an all-in type of thinking. We have to tax all of these things, or non of these things. That's bullshit. Legislation can start with the easiest to tax, homes, cars and jets. Hell unrealized gains in the stock market can be taxed, debt that use stock value as collateral can be taxed as a form of income for the individual. Then there is the argument that the wealthy will just move. Why is that a problem - it's not like the region they were moving from is losing out on tax revenue. If they take their business with them couldn't that open opportunities for others to fill in that gap with new similar businesses?
Also on the art collections and safe deposit box contents - that's call an inheritance tax. It doesn't need to be annual.
This article skims the surface with a "well its difficult so what can you do?" attitude.