this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
106 points (92.7% liked)
Selfhosted
59849 readers
621 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam.
-
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
dist-upgrade and full-upgrade are essentially the same command but yeah, I won't be using apt upgrade again in the future! Like I said in my post, the joys of being self taught is that you learn by my making mistakes and that's part of the "fun" 🤣
Nah, the fun is learning form others mistakes. Thanks for a fun read :}
Not essentially, exactly. One is a deprecated alias for the other.
Which one is which?
I thought full-upgrade replaced dist-upgrade that could make you think you're upgrading you distro to the next version
But now I'm not sure anymore.
Correct. Full-upgrade is the new term. It's an alias, though, so using either will accomplish the same thing.
dist-upgrade was used with apt-get
full-upgrade is used for apt