this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
661 points (84.3% liked)
Work Reform
16286 readers
51 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
WE ALREADY HAVE TO HAVE ID TO VOTE, what do you think voter registration is? In every single state you have to, get this, register to vote. You don't just walk into a polling station and just say give me a ballot. No they certify your citizenship BEFOREHAND. THAT'S WHY PEOPLE ARE ON THE VOTER ROLLS TO BEGIN WITH!
Sounds maddening and inefficient. I still don't see a problem with requiring proper ID when casting the ballot.
It's not inefficient, they check that you are a citizen before it's even time to vote You don't need to prove anything at the voting location generally. Because how much of a hassle would it be if you had to prove you're a citizen the day you go to vote? Can you imagine how long that would take? It's like pre-registering for anything.
Its required. You hand them your driver's license (photo ID) when you walk in.
In the US?
Yes
Then I have a really hard time seeing what the problem is.
The problem is too many women and minorities vote for the opposite party so they want to make laws that take away their rights without explicitly saying that is what they are doing.
You have a really hard time listening to anything but your singular republican "I don't see what's so wrong about providing ID" talking point.
The problem you're ignoring every time you paste that reddit republican shit is that republicans are trying to restrict what ID counts as a proper ID and have selected passports. Since they're a federal ID instead of a state ID, the trump-controlled federal government can restrict how they're issued. And selectively revoke them from people that republicans don't want voting.
Plus, they're expensive and time consuming to get. It's a de facto poll tax, and I'm sure you have a talking point about how poll taxes aren't so bad either.
I'll spell it out for you. I am not glued to yankee media. So no, I'm not reiterating "Republican talking points" or "pasting" from them. I'm just reacting to what I'm reading in this thread and what I've seen from some British media which has a similar discussion.
LOL. Insufferable. Bye.
Republican talking points don't politely stop at the water's edge. British media will happily print them.
See a therapist, man.
American. Can't afford to. Thanks for the ableist insult.
I gathered as much. I'm just saying not everyone you talk to on the internet is American. It's not the default. I'm writing to you in my third language. I have no obligation to follow your media cycle.
But regardless. I know that access to health care is limited for lots of Americans, and it was not my intention to be hurtful.
It's clear that republican propaganda has made its way to you anyway. You repeat it without a second thought.
You dismissed what I was saying by calling it mental illness. I can't see how that could have been intended as anything other than gaslighting and abuse.
The trouble you're having is that you're jumping to ridiculous and unhinged accusations. If you look at this very thread, I immediately changed my mind when a user pointed out that you already need photo ID for voting. But you just can't let it go. So "you" have won the political argument, I've conceded like 15 comments ago. That's the part where I think this goes beyond normal political outrage for a legitimate issue, and has probably crossed over into something that's affecting you and your relationships on a personal level. I do not mean this as an ad hominem although I phrased it in an unhelpful way.
More gaslighting.
Your response when someone pointed out that you already need an ID was:
That's not changing your mind. That's telling people who are upset at the attempt to disenfranchise voters that they're upset about nothing.