this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
964 points (98.9% liked)

memes

21496 readers
1750 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 218 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Well your first mistake was using Chrome in 2026

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 27 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

I hate that I still have to use Chrome because it can do some streaming stuff better than Firefox (and even Chromium for some reason). I only use it to connect to one KVM.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 82 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Do the streaming issues resolve themselves ✨magically✨ when faking the user agent to be Chrome for those streaming sites, e.g. using Firefox and a user agent add-on?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Many do, yes. Any time I get an error message like "You're not using a supported browser" that message vanishes after adjusting the user agent.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Well yes, the warning messages will disappear as those are often shown or not shown based on user agent.

But will the actual streaming issues go away is the big question.

Teams on the web for example, worked fine in Firefox even though it warned the user it didn't work in anything but Chrome.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago

I have not encountered streaming issues that could not be resolved by user agent so far.

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's the neat part - all always do!

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

My issues were with h265/HEVC support, proprietary stuff like media codecs can sometimes be a pain. I no longer have that need so I'm a happy fox.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty sure Firefox added support for HEVC a while back, but it relies on the system to provide the decoder (Which you'll usually have to pay extra for)

Firefox also supports MKV files now, which is nice.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Firefox also supports MKV files now, which is nice.

Since when‽ It feels like support for that format took centuries!

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In 145.

Funny thing is, the WebM format is actually a constrained profile of MKV, and Firefox strictly enforced those compatibility checks. Chrome never did though, so it could always support MKV files but only if you lied and claimed they were WebM.

Edit: Lemmy eats the highlight in the link, look for "Matroska" under "Web Platform"

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not in this case. It's an open source project. They usually don't do this shit.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Tell them to get their shit together and support open-source browsers, or more accurately just browser standards in general.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

For when I need Chrome, I use Vivaldi. Its probably over bloated for what I need, but it works.

I also use Vivaldi, and I don't care about the bloat.

I bought the entire computer, I'm going to use the entire computer.

When I need to use Chrome, I just use the Chrome Mask extension in Firefox to change my user agent. I haven’t had a site that actually failed to work on the Gecko engine instead of Chromium. It’s just lazy devs checking your user agent to see if you’re using Chromium, and then throwing a fit if you’re not.

Chrome Mask even has a built in site reporter, because broken sites don’t actually conform to modern web interoperability requirements. If it fails to work on Gecko, there’s a good chance that it will also fail to work on other platforms (like Apple’s WebKit) as well. And the reports go to the team that develops Firefox, so they can figure out why the site is refusing to work on Gecko.

[–] matchaotter@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

Vivaldi is a great Chromium browser. I'm more of a Firefox/Librewolf on my personal machines, but my work's software has a few features that only work with Chromium extensions so I had to use it. Was my preferred alternative to all others, while bloated it was highly controllable and didn't focus on unnecessary features like Brave or others. My work recently banned any browser that isn't Chrome/Edge/Firefox though, so I guess I'm back to Firefox and will ignore the features I can't use

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Try Brave for this use-case. I find that it works well for all kinds of streaming.

And while it's no Firefox or Librewolf, it's still a lot better than Chrome.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem with brave is that the CEO is a very bad person, the company also give me sketchy vibes with the crypto stuff they push

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, sure.

But even then still better than Chrome.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not better than Ungoogled Chromium nor Vivaldi.

[–] DaGammla@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Second Mistake was using Windows in 2026

[–] texture@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

id say this is the first mistake really

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

Icon checks out

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago

same i abandoned as soon as they said they were going to slow the browser/computer down for people using private mode. oh and it has no adblock that is good as ublock origin.