this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
881 points (96.9% liked)

Progressive Politics

4777 readers
640 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cl4irv0yant_cr4wfish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think that percentage should be much higher. Like once you've hit a million, 100% of anything more goes right back to the community. Social programs, housing, healthcare, etc.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I actually like really high (but sub 100%) numbers instead. It still gives a little incentive for the complete unhinged to earn money and hopefully society does much better with the 90% they collect than the 10% the billionaire does whatever with

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Some of the best times for the working class here in The U.S. happened when the tax rate was 90% on the highest earners.

With that said, I'm pissed about our current situation and looking for more of a "wipe them from the board" solution. If they're wise they'll look at the 90% tax rate as the gift that it is.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Put $5k into index funds per year, you will have $2m when you retire (assuming a conservative 8% annual gain). Now add in your home's value, etc. Retired middle class workers often have wealth over $1m.

Nobody will support taking pap's hard earned retirement money.