this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
284 points (97.7% liked)

Antique Memes Roadshow

9581 readers
1 users here now

Giving you the backstory and appraisals of vintage memes!

Submissions should be vintage memes or commentary about vintage memes. Commenters are advised to appraise the internet value and provenance meme antiquities.

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Depends on how you calculate expected value if you assume the empty tracts being taken is zero you do nothing to avoid unnecessary los of life, but if you assume those empty tracks being taken is a life saved and the value of saving a life is more than third of a value of losing a a life then you should pull the lever

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You'd also have to consider the value of the lives saved by not sending the train to the 5 person track.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought that information would be encoded when you assign -5 to it (value of the outcome of losing 5 lives) and -1 for 1 life lose doing nothing.

But the logic would be doing something and saving life is a plus, doing something and getting more people killed is a huge negative

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So basically, you're saying that the two tracks with people tied to them are valued at -1 and -5, while the empty tracks have some positive non-zero value?

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uhg you could read what I wrote

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Repeating what you were told in different words is a way of confirming your understanding. That's what I'm trying to do here.