this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
-31 points (31.3% liked)

Technology

85619 readers
3234 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

OpenAI still leads in agentic terminal coding, but by less.

Claude can plan the work and then run hundreds of parallel subagents in a single session (and with Opus 4.8, the agents can run for even longer)

That’s one way to turn profitable before the IPO, I guess. Goodbye tokens.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vinyl@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I want to be able to buy computer parts not some overpriced auto complete that won't benefit the majority of humanity. The cons of this tech outweigh the pros on orders of magnitudes.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 4 points 3 weeks ago

The tech is good, it's how business has been built around it that's the problem I think.

Ore accurate prices of open weight models would have softened the rush.

The copyright issues would be less if everything was open weight.

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

That remains to be seen. If open weight models get good enough and efficient enough, I don’t see what moat Anthropic, OpenAI, et al have. Maybe they can fade away so we can buy hardware again, and still reap the benefits of Turing-certified “autocomplete”.