this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
1343 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

12046 readers
2367 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah, because $16k is enough to survive.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A diet of nothing but rice and beans, living in a rented room in a garage, and dumpster diving for all the remaining necessities and you can almost live in California!

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm on a fixed income and cannot live in California. I do thanks to parents giving me some intergenerational wealth early by paying my $2k-ish rent for me. (They're in their eighties and still alive.)

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What timeframe is that $2k-ish rent?

[–] titter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

New York? A half month in a leaky but somehow airtight corrugated metal shed, no air conditioning and a communal bathroom that also happens to be the yard your "bungalow" is in

Ohio? 6 months in a house that used to be someones starter home but they added more to the house, cut it in half, and now charge the same if not more rent for each half than someone paid for the original mortgage. You will be harassed for the rent because "i have to pay the mortgage" but it was paid off over a decade ago. The landlord takes multiple vacations, out of the country, every year. Conveniently around storms and bad weather, so when your roof falls in there's nothing they can do for two weeks.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That doesn’t answer my question at all and you’re not the person I asked.

[–] titter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe asking questions on the Internet isn't for you ❤️

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe answering questions you don’t actually have the answer for isn’t for you 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] titter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are in a meme community for politics asking housing questions. Maybe show up at the right house before you start knocking 🤣 the fact that you had no worries but to reply immediately? Get real.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

I was about to take out the garbage when I saw your post which was convenient because it was just more trash.

Stay irrelevant

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

OP even acknowledged this and this shit is still top reply. Dumb fucks everywhere.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So what's that he acknowledged? The amount is too low to be considered a valid argument.

Let us deduct all expenses related to living, and we will quickly learn that for majority of people there isn't anything left to tax.

Or make a standard deductible for companies, let say $1M and any revenue above that has to be taxed.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

OP acknowledged the amount itself is of course debatable, and is an entirely separate topic. Yet here we are, again. The concept of whatever you think is a valid argument is moot, a totally separate topic, and there's no argument to be invalidated in the first place.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

You're right, of course. But I also think it would open up a giant loophole for the wealthy. A car is essential for survival! A three million dollar car? ... A 15,000sqft house?

Of course, they could set reasonable limits. But when was the last time congress was reasonable?