this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
45 points (95.9% liked)
Opensource
6209 readers
71 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Doesn't make sense... This premise seems flawed by two aspects:
It feels like they are not capable of detecting a vulnerability when they see one. meaning that they themselves can potentially introduce tons of new vulnerabilities unknowingly.
In this situation it would be for the best to have a large pool of contributors capable of detecting such issues, instead of closing it even further.
They are worried about vulnerabilities that are introduced knowingly. They said that in the past you could trust that if someone spend months writing code for you project he did it with good faith and not to sneak a backdoor past you. Basically they assumed a hacker would not invest months of work trying to add a bug to an open source project because it's just not worth it. Now, because of AI, someone can easily create big PR with a hidden bug hoping that it will get merged.
I have no idea how true it is (i.e. if AI is able to generate a big PR that will pass all the checks and get approved) but logically it does make sense.