this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
106 points (94.9% liked)

Gaming

7788 readers
202 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On May 12, a developer going by FzzyBzzy released the wildly racist slavery simulation game Plantation Simulator onto Steam.

It’s a top-down sim game in which you play as a Southern plantation owner forcing a number of Black slaves to grow crops under threat of being beaten. That’s it. That was the game.

For the first week or so this game was live, it mostly flew under the radar. No reviews, no players really, according to SteamDB. But around May 20-21, it started picking up.

Reviews began to trickle in, the vast majority of them positive, containing racist commentary, and largely written by people who had played for less than half an hour. For context, the game’s concurrent player peak was 109 individuals last night.

Posted later in the day yesterday, the 1.2 update changed the Black slave characters in the game to white people. A further update not long after changed the whipping animation to a string of hearts, put bikinis on the slave characters, and updated the mature content description to, “In this game, your friends wear bikinis and you can give them little kissies.”

We’ve reached out to Valve for comment twice now about Plantation Simulator and haven’t heard back, and the game remains on the Steam store at the time this piece was published.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 87 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

lmao

It seems like it was a bait and switch to troll racists. They slowly turned the game into a weird romance thing through updates.

Posted later in the day yesterday, the 1.2 update changed the Black slave characters in the game to white people. A further update not long after changed the whipping animation to a string of hearts, put bikinis on the slave characters, and updated the mature content description to, “In this game, your friends wear bikinis and you can give them little kissies.” Since that update, the user reviews have entirely flip-flopped

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh 100% sounds like it was. What’s wild is that Valve allowed it to go up like that for a couple weeks, and then allowed the bait and switch to happen and still said nothing.

In my opinion it should have been pulled the second it went up.

The bait and switch, while hilarious, should from Valve’s end should warrant an optional refund window I think (but you know, fuck them racists). That’s just from the perspective of if another game did a bait and switch (a legit one) you’d want the same.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It never should have gotten beyond the approval stage to have been on Steam at all, IMO.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There's not really an approval process. It's not a curated store.

Unless people report a game, Valve doesn't monitor what happens with it

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago

There is an approval process, but it's very much about matching the game you are selling to the claims about it on the store page. It's not really about content beyond that.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

This is exactly the problem with most big sites. Valve has just been relatively lucky so far but I expect it wont last forever.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Definitely not, and very concerning that it did

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The best part is the play cycle sounds like it hasn't changed, so why do they not like it now?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I bought a game and it suddenly became racist with an update, I'd want a refund.

These people just have backwards moral systems.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But it is a perfect highlight that what they like is the racism, not the gameplay.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly. That makes it all the more damning.