this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
54 points (88.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

4695 readers
537 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

The main thing that disappoints me is how he handled the totenkopf thing. He claims not to know it was a nazi tattoo. I don't think he is, or ever was a nazi, but he absolutely has known what the tattoo was since the day he got it.

The truth is probably just that he was a dumb kid who just saw it as a symbol of an "elite" military unit and just general rebelliousness, like the punk musicians who adopted nazi imagery. 20 years ago, nazis didn't seem like a real threat; they seemed like history (to a lot of people). Like even though genghis khan committed a lot of atrocities, I wouldn't think someone with a genghis tattoo is some kind of apologist.

He should have taken the opportunity to actually explain himself, cause I think it's important to show that just because you were a dumbass doesn't mean you need to keep being one. Instead, I'm sure he listened to campaign strategists yelling him to pretend he didn't know what it was.