this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
150 points (96.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

15991 readers
263 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/51030008

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With how popular huge SUVs seem to be, that would be a very unpopular measure. Then you also have the car manufacturer lobbies squeezing your balls if you try to pass something like that.

I'd like a middle ground where these cars have much higher insurance premiums and are heavily taxed in proportion to their space usage.

Want to drive around in a car that weighs 3x my city car, then you need to pay 3x as more.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Road damage caused by a vehicle is proportional to the fourth power of vehicle weight. That leaves out other externalities such as deaths and injuries caused to pedestrians, cyclists and people in other motor vehicles.

But taxes should reflect externalities, so a bit part of vehicle tax should also rise as the fourth power of vehicle weight. Double the weight, sixteen times the tax. I'd make enforcement simpler by setting a zero-rate mimimum of 1000 kg.

By the way, use of this formula also illustrates the imbecility of those demanding a tax on bicycles. If the base rate is, let's say, £100 per annum for an unladen 1-tonne vehicle, then that for a bike weighing 20kg would be £100/100**4. That is, 1/10,000 of a pound, or 1/100 of a penny. And other bicycle-caused externalities aren't much different in proportion to those caused by a motor vehicle.