this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
567 points (96.7% liked)

Political Memes

12052 readers
2093 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would disown my kid for being a murderer if it was not for reason of insanity or self protection or otherwise justifiable, yes. Or a torturer, etc. There are certain extreme moral lines that I would have to acknowledge that my child as I knew them did not exist. But they are certainly of the most extreme, it would be very difficult to do so, and it would be very rare circumstances.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There are serial killers who aren't insane?

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Depends on your definition of sanity I suppose, but legally? Yea, most of them are sane.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's legal definitions and whatnot but my definition is more like "is there something deeply wrong with you?" Which a serial killer clears with ease.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a lot deeply wrong with me but I'm still not clinically insane. Insane people genuinely don't have control over their actions thus cannot be held to account, only put away for public safety. I think calling serial killers insane both absolves them of responsibility and dilutes the meaning of the word for people actually suffering serious mental illnesses.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Deeply" is both present in what I wrote and also subjective. I don't think "insane" implies no control exactly. These things are more complicated than that.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A person experiencing a fullblown psychotic episode is beyond the point of self control, and frequently self recognition. It's a seriously rare occurrence, and it usually doesn't result in the death of anyone but the sufferer. I just think the distinction should be made between people who may be highly disturbed or psychopathic, or on a revenge streak or whatever reason they have, and people suffering a very serious mental illness that in the midst of an episode wound up killing somebody.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I mean yeah, true.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if they objectively made the world a better place? E.g. they were picking off the billionaires?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You're just describing the premise for the book/show Dexter.

To those wondering, the legal definition of sanity is basically "do you know how long you'll get for this crime?"

Not a lawyer, all the family lawyers are civil, but I lived down the street from a family of norteños and a couple houses further from a family of sureños. Life was interesting growing up.

Dude I know it's a tautology and a meme but society is insane. You have to be crazy to be sane in this world.