Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
6. Defend your opinion
This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
view the rest of the comments
Oh, yeah, I also really value history. And I think there is a very strong historical allegory to the modern day: the 1930s. Specifically, modern America and 30s Germany. But that's an equation thousands of others have amply made, so I'll move on.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, most people view the past as this untouchable, sorta divine thing, to put up on a pedestal and look at without judgement. You know, "the good old days", "it was a different time". But I want to put the past under a microscope, pull off its legs, and see how it ticks. Like what I did with the Monty Python sketch, I analysed it from the point of view of a comedian or a writer, and pointed out how well they managed to stick to their artistic vision, or at least what I maybe think their artistic vision should be. I'm engaging in a dialogue with it, you could say. So yeah, I don't want to be understanding, I want to understand. I want to be like a scientist, not like ChatGPT's idea of a therapist. I want to use empathy to create knowledge, not use empathy to forestall action.