this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
421 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

86333 readers
3246 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What? That's a very different situation than what I was talking about with software development. I thought I pretty clearly outlined the core of what it means to be an engineer- Custodians aren't doing engineering work. As you said, that doesn't make the role less important or less deserving of dignity.

Just calling someone an engineer because it sounds better is silly and demeans both the actual role and the work that engineers do.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Okay, so the argument does not apply to that situation. A simple "no" would have sufficed...

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is more useful to explain why something is wrong

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah the explanation was fine but the "What? That's a very different situation" seemed unnecessarily hostile. But maybe it just have my panties in a bunch today, it could be me

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I wasn't intentionally trying to be rude, it genuinely took me aback. I'm sorry to have come across that way.

From my perspective, tt felt like you hadn't actually read my argument and were responding in bad faith, since this comparison is the sort of thing that people say to dismiss software engineering as a sort of thought-terminating cliche.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, my bad. I didn't really need to take offense to it, I was probably just grumpy and didn't know what else to say. It wasn't that big a deal.

But no, I wasn't trying to be dismissive of your argument qua software engineering, but I see how it came off that way. I think it was a good argument, I was just bringing up something tangentially related out of nothing more than free-association style banter. In hindsight it wasn't really that relevant to the conversation anyway...