this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
618 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

12105 readers
2789 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 73 points 1 week ago (9 children)

"No, it was about states' rights!"

"States' rights to do what?"

"... >:[ "

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They why did the confederate state’s formal declarations of succession say that slavery was the reason they were succeeding?

[–] wieson@feddit.org 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

secession, seceding

I don't think they were succeeding

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It was explicitly NOT about states' rights. The Confederacy hated states' rights. They were the ones pissed they couldn't enforce their shitty laws in the North. They prevented any of their member states from ever outlawing slavery.

That line isn't just a cutesy way of hiding the ugly part behind the technical truth, it's a flat out lie.

You're absolutely right, and I had no intention to mean otherwise with my memery. Apologies for the misunderstanding!

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

Technically it was over a state's rights to ban slavery.

The slavers really hated that and wanted to expand as much as possible.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Remember when Republicans did shit recently in the name of "state's rights" to hate and then when states that didn't want Trump's bulashit said "oh let's pass our own laws to undo his cuntery" Republicans and Trump said these states had to follow federal law?

Ra damn Trump and Republicans are hypocrites.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago

Article I Section 9(4) of the Confederate constitution:

No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed.

Yeah, they specifically restricted state's rights.

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

B̵̃ͅ ̷̰̆U̵͇̾ ̷̪͝Ṟ̶͛ ̴̙͋Ṇ̷̌

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

States' rights to do what, motherducker!