Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
view the rest of the comments
It's important to remember that the US government isn't a democracy -- it's not ruled by or for the populous. The interest of the elites who control the government is first and foremost to retain and accumulate power. That's not to say that elites are anti-technology, but rather they're more interested in avoiding taxes and securing technologies for themselves than in recklessly funding wide spread innovations. The current system does that by taxing the bottom 95% of the population to fund basic research at universities (which even accept poor people as scientists) then allowing elites to attempt to control the innovations as they walk them the last mile to implementation. Of-course, these attempts at control have had a uncomfortable fail rate - often spawning new oligarchs. It seems like some portion of the current batch of oligarchs is having second thoughts about allowing any innovation at all, and thus going after universities.
I should emphasize that not all of this is conscious reasoning, rather there's a lot of "this direction is not in my self interest therefore it's bad" reasoning from oligarchs, which manifest in a system that effectively operates under this reasoning. Of-course, let's not pretend the oligarchs are stupid either. I have no doubt that this is a conscious and deliberate push for some of them. Doesn't really matter.
...
Also, I'm a structural biologist, so let me judge your research proposal: 15M funds 6 people for 4 years, and understanding the molecular structure of enzymes is really important for drug development. Proteins (including enzymes) often come in families with related functions, so understanding "milk enzymes in cows hair" might actually shed a lot of light on an entire family of enzymes with broad biological effects. In fact studying many variants across many species is a component of how we got alphafold and the current claude attempt to compete with pharmaceutical companies to develop small-molecule drugs.