Asklemmy

54946 readers

84 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

could any lawyer explain what exactly is this defense witness achieving? (linux.community)

submitted 2 weeks ago by vestmoria@linux.community to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't understand his strategy, he answers the prosecutor' questions extremely vaguely. I don't know if I could act like that if called as a witness.

Is this something I should imitate when dealing with HR?

I don't understand why how he answers is not lying.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

This is cross-examination. Meaning, he is the defense's witness. Meaning, he wants the defense to win. He feels that his findings support the defense, so he doesn't want the prosecutor to lead the jury to improper inferences.

I will say that refusing to answer how many hours you worked does make you look like an unreliable witness. Like, the jury is going to find him less credible because of the way he is answering, and that will undermine the jury's confidence in his findings.