this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
68 points (98.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9397 readers
200 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just charge what the utilities cost. Why you gotta make up some bullshit to tack ontop?

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Because they’ll always invent some BS way to charge you more while providing less.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

Why

They thought of a bigger number and now its your problem.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Dragon levels of greed

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Well, the article seems to explain it: they can't.

Local policies seem to cap the rent to protect renters, so they make up some bullshit extra fees to bypass those caps.

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Local policies seem to cap the rent to protect renters, so they make up some bullshit extra fees to bypass those caps.

And a functional local government wouldn't allow that kind of sophistry and would treat that exactly like illegal rent increases. But you can't have both landlords existing and any level of functional government.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

Sometimes they're included, sometimes not, sometimes some are while others are not.