Privacy

50260 readers

577 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

139

Kmart sells out of low-cost rival to Meta camera glasses across Australia amid warnings of ‘privacy nightmare’ (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 5 days ago by FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Story about low priced Anko branded competitor to Meta smart glasses. The story author calls out that despite Meta's attempts to prevent recording if the LED is covered, it is easy to get around the block. I think it's good for mainstream press to say it, so more ppl realize. They also call out that human moderators at Meta review their smart glasses footage. Inc videos of people having sex or using the toilet.

IDK if public backlash will nix the market for these, or if opposition will dry up and in 10 more years they will be mainstream tech like smartphones are today. I could see it going either way TBH.

It scares me that one of those timelines leads to a hellscape worse than the one we already have.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Okay

[–] artyom@piefed.social -4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

People are already accustomed to being recorded in public. The "follow-up step" has nothing to do with local recording devices.

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

To some degree, but at least when it happens it's quite a bit more transparent and explicit. With the average consumer knowingly, or unknowingly, storing their smartphone's contents with a non end-to-end encrypted cloud provider, the recordings from this smartphone-connected device synced to it, will also become cloud accessible. So there's nothing inherently local about these devices, at least not in the hands of the average consumer.