this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
78 points (97.6% liked)
Asklemmy
55501 readers
438 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thats not at all what i meant, and by no means i am belittling the issue. But the dependency is the the point. All official action is actively trying to not improve the situation and just continue running fullspeed against the wall. It is baffling to me how much influence anything fossil fuel related has to convince so many stakeholders to rather burn everything than accept losses. Then again maybe thats just capitalsm at heart.
No idea, just don't say I am comparing the two as the same. Thanks for the clarification about the CFC producers being small fry, that makes sense. But rejecting the idea of any sort of change in terms of fossil fuels is just fucking stupid, and very common in my experience. And i'm talking about shit like german car producers advocating for their super optimized ICE over shitty woke batteries. Or neglecting the possibility of heating a house without burning shit because infrastructure isn't in place at this very moment