this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
45 points (97.9% liked)

RetroGaming

30096 readers
58 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Xylinna@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
gts@lemmy.world
45
How were you meant to complete games that had no save system? (feddit.uk)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by smeg@feddit.uk to c/retrogaming@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Most of the games I played back in the day had some way of resuming your progress at a later date, whether that was an actual save system, a password system, or even a hidden warp zone. What were you supposed to do for longer games that had no way at all of resuming your progress after switching the console off? Get good enough at the start of it that you could play the game faster and eventually complete it in one go, or just leave the console on overnight and continue the next day?

(and yes, my Mega Drive is currently sitting powered on because I couldn't think of a better way to keep my progress)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pasdechance@jlai.lu 3 points 4 days ago

The console games I played were nearly all meant to be completed in one go.

Anything without a password or save option worked that way.

We'd also rent our games, so even if there was a save file you had to remember what to do because your save would be deleted. My brother had a copy of Final Fantasy I with a dead battery and we just left the console on for a few days straight. Same thing with his copy of Zelda, but that one was somewhat manageable in an afternoon.

RNG was less common, most games were memorization exercises: Mario, Shinobi, etc. So after dying and retrying enough you'd figure it out.