this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
600 points (96.4% liked)

politics

29032 readers
1971 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 147 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

So long as there's a proper primary I don't see the harm in this, not really. I can't see her running a good enough campaign to make it through the primaries, at least not without also having a good enough campaign to beat the fascist party after Trump.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 141 points 2 weeks ago (48 children)

the key here is “proper primary.” I can’t remember a time when they’ve had one that wasn’t fucked up in some way.

load more comments (48 replies)
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just to terrify you a little bit. In the 2020 election, Harris and Biden only had one candidate that regularly polled worse than they did, which was a culty Tulsi. And if you remember, out of that large field, Biden won.

The DNC has a gigantically fat thumb on the scales.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago

Remember when the media decided that Biden winning the south Carolina primary was basically a coronation.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Three words: Hillary Rodham Clinton

It sure looked like Bernie was gonna kick her butt until the DNC decided they didn’t like a Democratic Socialist possibly winning. Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned for a reason.

I don’t trust the primaries to be fair. There is too much money and power at stake to let “the people” actually decide the candidates. To me it’s the major reason everyone says both parties are the same. It’s because both candidates are picked by the same people, at least at this level. Yes I know they aren’t the same, especially now. But have you ever noticed how feckless the Democratic leadership seems to be? It’s because the billionaires are really the ones in power.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago

The only purpose of the staggered primary is for them to slowly manufacture your consent for who they want. The only way we're going to get an honest primary is if the entire country did it on one day like we do the general

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

a regular primary with enough debates, and where superdelegates are shun till the end, should be bare minimum

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

How about just no super delegates and the people decide.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

How about a primary where superdelegates get no more/better votes than anyone else?

What am I thinking? That might result in someone who isn't on the corporate teat!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 85 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you fucking stupid? You lost to Donald Fucking Trump—you know, the racist, fascist pedophile rapist? You lost to that guy, and you'd be running against his specter and his legacy, the racist and xenophobic sentiments that still run deep in this country.

What is uniting the American people, however, is a rising class consciousness, not establishment Dems like you. We already tried voting for "not-Trump," and y'all squandered the opportunity to appease the wealthy, expand the police state, send more bombs to Israel, and treat all the people shouting "Danger!" like children, rather than securing our democracy and standing against genocide.

Fuck. Right. Off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 80 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

I mean, she'd be better than Trump. But that's such a ridiculously low bar.

Surely the Dems can come up with a better candidate that her, Gavin Newsom, or some similarly uninspiring/greasy candidate. Right? Right???

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 43 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That isn't the question, the question is over whether the DNC and the ruling class allow any other candidate to run against Trump.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Well, we're in luck, the new chair of the DNC (Ken Martin) wants more candidates like Zohran Mamdani, and he has complete control over the DNC until August 2029.

He's also pouring money into local races, supporting the local democratic parties the previous few DNC chairs mostly ignored.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago

But Harris is the best candidate… For the interests of the wealthy members of the DNC.

She will keep things exactly how they are, but act like they have changed for the better. The rich will get richer, and the poor will get assaulted by police.

Why would the DNC give a single fuck about the desires of anyone but themselves? They suffer no consequences for their actions.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Hux@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago
[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Jesus Christ woman, get a fucking clue. You lost the presidency to the worst piece of shit on the face of the planet. Why in the fuck do you think you have any chance against anyone else?

[–] tackleberry@thelemmy.club 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So this means JD Vance will be president in 2028?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I knew Democrats were in on this shit but if they run Kamala in 2028 then they're 100% complicit. There's 0% chance she wins

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People that lose to Donald fucking Trump should fuck off forever.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

At this point, that's pretty much all of us

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm once again reminded of the secret attack plan from Blackadder 4.

Capt. Blackadder: We all climb out of our trenches and march slowly across no man's land?

Capt. Darling: How do you know that Blackadder? It's classified information.

Capt. Blackadder: It's what we did the last time, the time before that and the previous fifteen before that.

General Melchit: Precisely! The absolute last thing the watchful Hun will expect is for us to do the exact same thing as the past seventeen times thus catching him entirely by surprise!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

They'll do everything but what will actually get them elected willingly. Neo-liberals need to wake up and realize it's either going to have progress away from capitalism or just all of us drowning in fascism because they refuse much needed and necessary change.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

People seem to have forgotten the only reason she was the candidate was because Biden dropped out and she was the VP.

She got practically no votes in the primaries.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] zd9@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Get. The. FUCK. Out.

Don't come back. The country, or what's left of it, can't afford her. She's fine as a milquetoast corporatist, but she has proven she can't do it.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

No. Just no. Other countries cn rise above misogyny, but not us. Dems need to drop this whole "please the right" schtick too. We need someone actually progressive, someone who doesn't ride the Israeli money train, and alas - is male. Bonus points for not playing the "we need to forgive and forget" card either. It didn't work, and a lot of these assholes are just regurgitating the South. They lost, but never faced punishment. If we let racism slide, we let them build confidence and organize.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If she's nominated, it's a fix. Classic authoritarian playbook: maintain the illusion of democracy by propping up an opponent that you aren't likely to lose to. Then, stuff the ballot boxes anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Capable_Coping@piefed.social 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If the Democratics run Harris or New some I might actually lose my mind. have we learned nothing from the past decade?

[–] lemjukes@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 weeks ago

absolutely not

[–] mitch404@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Cute that US still think they will have elections after the orange buffoon. November will be very interesting, and maybe an eye opener for the remaining septics: I'll say it here now, trump is a fascist, a pedophile, a narcissist, and a dictator. He will not leave. He will use putin's playbook. The rest of the world needs to wake up now and consider the US as an antagonist, same as Russia and China. I would be delighted to be wrong, wait and see I guess.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Jesus Christ, we don't need Hillary 3.0.

We need someone who can say something and it's like...actual fucking words that normal people can relate to. Not something that was written in committee by some consultants working off polling.

"Don't rape kids. Don't violate the Constitution. Everyone gets to vote."

None of this is complicated.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd still take her over MAGA, any day.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Good for you, that is irrelevant because empty centrist, corporate politicians like her will never win against MAGA.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 17 points 2 weeks ago

If she wins the nomination, then MAGA wins the presidency.

Please don't be stupid.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So far it's Harris and Newsom. Cool. Cool cool cool.

No, I'm not worried at all. Who said I'm worried?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Either there will be a socialist president in 2028 or democracy will be dissolved by 2036.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Please no. I was excited for her last election but that failed and now I don't wanna hear from her ever again.

Are you shitting me that the dnc (or should I say the billionaires backing the dnc) can't find someone else???

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So sick of the US's neo liberals masquerading as left. A lot can change in a few years hopefully there will be enough change. In the end all that matters is if people wake up to the lies before it too late. It's incredible how bad it has to get before people wake up.

The MAGA movement is crumbling but only time will tell if it's enough. A lot of delusional neo liberals think things will just go back to normal if they get in office next term

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah cause we want a former prosecutor to head up the ACAB crowd. Democratic party is shit.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 16 points 2 weeks ago (23 children)

Oh for fuck sakes! C'mon lady! Sacrifice! Let a new face do it! There's 300 million of us. I'm sure someone else can be better than you know who. Go do something else to help democracy. I'd vote Beyonce.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Imagine losing twice the orange shit heel. Like getting back up, looking in the mirror, taking full stock of all your pro cop and ideal stances and thinking "no I was on to something the first time. I'll make them see"

I can't anymore with this place. Release me

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›