this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
224 points (98.7% liked)

News

28322 readers
3967 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 17 hours ago

Great wealth goes hand in hand with great corruption. People don't earn a billion dollars. It has to be stolen, from many, at scale.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, it's in the name. It wasn't a golden age, it was just made to look that way.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 24 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly. The thin covering of gold was meant to represent the small minority holding all of the wealth.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago

Just libertarian cope

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Like a veneer or something

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Yep, that's specifically the meaning :)

Golden = Made of gold

Gilded = Covered in a thin layer of gold

The gold and the thin layer was the 1%-ers, with rampant corruption and harsh conditions for everyone else.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 26 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Concentration of wealth drives the corruption and many other negative externalities. So we should very much focus on wealth first and foremost, no matter how hard it tries to divert attention from itself.

[–] Devdoggy@lemm.ee 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I love that this article is locked behind a paywall. Guilded age. Ha!

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Except that it's not. If you've got Javascript turned on and don't run a browser extension which strips off the access token from the URL, you have free access for the next couple weeks.

[–] Devdoggy@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

Reset your browser and/or device. Then click the link

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 19 hours ago

Wealth, corruption; toMAYto, toMAHto.

[–] PointyReality@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I want to point out that all those articles that were linked advising the US is in/entering/ or Trump main goal is to usher in a guided age is just quoting Trump saying that's what he wants.

A vast distinction to what is actually happening, particularly with the Tarrifs.

I want to point out that just because wealth is being hoarded by a few industries does not mean this is not necessarily good for workers or the average citizens. Sure things got done but that's because they do not have rights nor the education we have these days to understand that the average citizens deserves better.

If this is what the US ends up trying to go back to, then lol. Goodluck with that. If you want I can start sending across some gold panning equipment as I know a lot of people made their fortune looking for gold during that time period as well. Might be a steep price though because of the tarriffs.

[–] Dubiousx99@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

This is not a news article. It is a history article. The opposite of news.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Then half of npr articles are not news. There is breaking news then there is looking at current issue from a lens of a bit of time. I like those the best actually as breaking news tends to be full of fud but with a few months of time the picture becomes more clear. Then there are things like this taking a current issue and comparing it in a historical context. I find those valuable as well. It would not appear if we were not in a new gilded age but since the same mistakes are being repeated its relevant. Half the article talks about what is going now.

[–] Dubiousx99@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, many of those articles are not news. The are opinion editorial pieces just like this one. This is political article and should be posted in politics, not news. I contend that the failure to differentiate opinion pieces from objective news is the reason so many people are able to fall victim to misinformation campaigns.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 19 hours ago

Historical context is not merely opinion. It boggles my mind that you can use the phrase objective news given whats currently considered news compared to historic context that being further from spin and given verification time is has solid facts.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

For some history is news. American history education is complete garbage, in the US at least.

[–] Dubiousx99@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Fair point.