For reference, they own:
- Game Rant
- TheGamer
- Polygon
- FextraLife
- OpenCritic
- DualShockers
- Hardcore Gamer
Some well known sites in there, but hardly ‘most’ of gaming journalism.
We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
For reference, they own:
Some well known sites in there, but hardly ‘most’ of gaming journalism.
This also leaves out all the game journalism that isn‘t even on most people‘s radars. Namely non-english game journalism. That‘s a huge part most people naturally know very little about.
Are they why Polygon is the gaming equivalent of entertainment slop instead of being about games?
Polygon used to be great RIP
I only used gaming magazines pre internet. After that, forums, eventually Steam reviews, and occasionally an independent YouTuber review. Never even heard of these sites, except polygon. Who is using these sites today ?
Most? They own like four blogs, and recently, How-To Geek, which has always been kinda shit.
I don't have any of them bookmarked, but I've read CBR (comic book blog) when their links are posted.
I feel like Gawker is bigger. I used to read a bunch of their sites. Reddit hated them for a minute because they doxxed one of their paedophile mods, but I never had a problem with them. Kotaku is kind of mid for a gaming site, but they cover a lot of ground. I still read Gizmodo from time to time, but it's very mid.
I read Ars Technica, which is owned by Condé Nast, which owns Reddit. Ars Technica's Aurich (not their main guy as I once thought, but one of their most prolific posting staff members, calls himself "The Director of Many Things") is very transparent about Ars's relationship with Condé Nast, saying CN basically lets them do their own thing. I believe him, and Ars has a good amount of integrity. Their community, however, is a lot like Reddit, especially since they got up/down voting, they tend to bury opinions that go against the hive mind (but hilariously, they quote it and the quote post gets upvoted, so they really aren't censoring shit, but they get that power and the blood goes straight to the little head). But the site itself is pretty good. They did have that mishap where the blogger used AI to make a post and it misquoted a guy, but they fired the guy who did that, so they're still good in my book.
Nothing to do with gaming or tech, but the main thing I associate Condé Nast with is the discrimination against brown and female Youtube hosts at Bon Appétit. Fuck Condé Nast, even if they aren't actively interfering with Ars Technica.
Also, at this point I don't even care if the headline about Valnet owning "most" is accurate; I will always upvote threads raising awareness about the dangers of media consolidation.
Who reads these sites these days anyway
Seems like a complete dead internet circlejerk to rip off advertisers. No humans involved except for siphoning off money.
And Ziff Davis owns the rest.