But at the cost of how many others?
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Material losses include two C-130 planes and two Little Bird helicopters abandoned on ground.
I don't know if they had human casualties, but it seems they spent about 200 million dollars to rescue the pilots.
Pretty expensive.
From a strategic view of the war as a whole, $200 million is not a lot. If it keeps Iran from having US prisoners of war.
If the US was presented up front with an option of a) pay $200 million or b) give Iran 2 US prisoners of war, then there is zero doubt that the US would gladly take the deal. Politically, it is a no-brainer choice.
The US military reports the cost of individual airframes as “lifetime cost to operate” (it’s required to by law) — this includes things like crewing, maintenance, and fuel over a 30-50 year scheduled lifetime, as well as development costs.
Cost of procurement is much lower. So, it doesn’t cost $200 million to replace those platforms. It’s certainly not cheap, just nowhere near that much.
Thanks, I didn't know that and accidentally provided an over-estimate.
It’s not like you were wrong; it’s just that some context can help.
Eh, he was unambiguously wrong though? Not that it is forbidden to be wrong, mistakes happen.
Assume a new airframe replacement was hypothetically bought tomorrow, to take the destroyed airframe's place. That makes it very clear that the cost sustained by the US is not “lifetime cost to operate”.
Idk Jan, I find it hard to believe coming from the liars administration. At this point, word from the US propaganda machine have the same (or even less) value than those from the Iranian one. I'm gonna need proof of that to believe it, given the circumstances, and I'm gonna need irrefutable proof, not just a picture.
There has been talk about Trump just "declaring victory", and then going home. If Iran had held these two Americans as prisoners of war, that would have been much harder for Trump to do.
On the other hand, it would give a kind of symbolic win to trump in a peace plan, a PoW exchange could have been a way for Trump to get something out of the war.
Now, let’s hope that nobody else was killed during that rescue mission