this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
132 points (98.5% liked)

politics

29581 readers
1661 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Giving Trump all that glitters with a wide grin isn't a bargaining chip for a city under siege. And what, exactly, did LA walk out of this meeting with? Nothing. Except for a neat little preview of the Bass administration's posture as we head into our self-imposed megaevent purgatory.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago

Was reported as having a mismatched headline, in this case, OP swapped the headline for the sub-headline as it's more descriptive.

I tend to agree... "She really didn't need to do this" is not descriptive enough for people to click on it.

Fortunately the subheadline is.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 16 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

According to the article, there were over 3000 of those torches made, and they would be between $1200 and $10000 to acquire one. That is too expensive of a gift.

Everything else, you know, sometimes politicians have to shake hands and smile even though they're greeting the most evil people. Sometimes they even have to present gifts to these people. But a $1200 gift from a mayor to the president is unacceptable in my opinion.

Most expensive gifts to the president are historically received as gifts to the country and not personally kept by the president. But I'm guessing Trump doesn't hold himself to that standard.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 11 points 7 hours ago

Trump's standard is "Mine! Everything is mine!"

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

How much is a gold bar right now? In the millions?

(screenshot at 4 minutes in article video):

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/08/07/tim-cook-gift-to-trump/

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Honestly the dude is easily swayed by bullshit gifts. If that’s all it takes to win favor then might as well play the game.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't Mamdani do this too?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The article says he gave an old newspaper and a photoshopped newspaper

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Did he say "Corporate wants you to find the difference?"