this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
860 points (97.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39706 readers
4963 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 105 points 5 days ago (7 children)

One thing I always hated about microblogs and their character limits was that it was just enough characters to spout stupid bullshit but never enough to explain to why it's wrong.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 55 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

And you can't just be like "Ok I have master's degree in this specific subject" because then the response is inevitably some form of "ok then please provide sources which would allow me to condense 6 years of your education into something I can refute in 6 minutes, and refusing to do so will out you as a liar."

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 50 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why interact on an even playing field? Just make like 15 accounts and convince them they have a neurological disorder like a normal human being.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Every argument on lemmy right there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (16 children)

If you're explaining, you're loosing.

Introduction to elementary debate, 17th addition. page 1.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 14 points 5 days ago

George Will on Donald Trump and Twitter.

"It's perfect for him, because he can encapsulate everything he knows into 140 characters."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (4 children)

There are some people who have just been filled with so much wrong information over the course of their life that it's impossible to reach them. Anything you say to them will have a keyword that puts their guard up, any fact you share would be fake news. It's like their brains have been encrypted with the propaganda and hate. It's pavlovian. I try to recognize it in myself and maintain an open mind but it's hard.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Now imagine that they're your parents.

It's fucking awful.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] godzillabacter@lemmy.world 63 points 5 days ago

"Never argue with stupid people because they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." George Carlin

[–] CallMeAl@piefed.zip 59 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The common pattern I see often is that they simply refuse to address or even acknowledge your points and instead just spout even more bullshit. Once I see that, I just block and move on.

I have no time for intellectually dishonest people.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (3 children)

So often it's me typing out a big old comment. Realizing I can preempt some nuance to help the conversation. Thinking of a dozen more little nitpicks that might happen and realizing it's just not worth it and it's really the idiocy of the argument that's making it so hard to explain myself.

[–] GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You encountered Brandolini's Law aka the Bullshit Asymmetry Principle: it takes an order of magnitude more effort to debunk bullshit than it takes to produce it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fum@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (9 children)

I met a guy in a sauna the other day who started preaching to me and saying that he doesn't believe in science because it contradicts the bible story of creation.

I just had nothing to say to this man. His perception of reality is so far off base that I cannot comprehend his thought processes.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Gish galloping is a well known argumentative technique to avoid scrutiny. It works so well, that now the US government is using a version of it to destroy the government at a rapid pace.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, everytime Kenny the fascist comes to tell me the woah's of the world from his perspective. They get one conversation when I establish their position. The second convo is to establish my own. The third and subsequent conversations are purposefully hostile.

You have to maintain hygiene when dealing with these creatures.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago
[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 11 points 4 days ago

7/10 ppl online.

But w lemme its still 7/10....but there's obly like 10 users so I can handle it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

MAGAs. Sometimes I don't even debate them, I ignore them and talk about them as if they weren't there, make fun of their arguments, laugh at them, mock them, just generally bully them, without even addressing them directly. They really hate that.

MAGAs and Anti-Vaxxers are about the only acceptable bullying targets, and they should be bullied as viciously and as relentlessly as possible. The damage they have done is incalculable, they deserve it.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I've yet to encounter either on Lemmy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] axh@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago (2 children)

In science there is an answer "you are not even wrong" which is a polite way of saying that wat you said makes so little sense, that it cannot even be disproven.

[–] JohnSmith@feddit.uk 17 points 5 days ago

Originally used by Wolfgan Pauli, I believe. He also said “I don't mind your thinking slowly; I mind your publishing faster than you think.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Matombo@feddit.org 16 points 5 days ago (5 children)

"Right extremists are defending Democracy"

Just 2 weeks ago and I still haven't recovered from hearing that in person.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

In my wise old age I don't waste time on fools. I no longer have the patience. I used to try to talk them out of whatever stupidity they're peddling and it was rarely successful. Not worth the effort.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

See

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

That fact that there is a term for it is just as depressing.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I see you have met my in-laws. This isn't just some boomer humor, they have truly transcended their Fox News addicted roots and now get really angry about aliens, chemtrails, and all sorts of bullshit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I have heard the way to do it, is to take their crazy and take it WAY past their line until they back off themselves.

Moron: "There are only two genders!"
Normal: "Right?!"
Moron: "Ma-"
Normal: "Trans and supergay".

No comment on the contents of my example. It's the only comic strip I remember at the moment.

[–] BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It's hard to win an argument with a smart person. It's damn near impossible to win an argument with an idiot.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Yes, I block them, after I make sure that they're insistent on being disingenuous, and not merely misinformed.

Related: Pretty sure I've blocked most of the .world moderators/admins at this point.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

Yes, i have meet a person before. I have also commented on the internet.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

I used to work with people who would smoke whatever weed their friend gave them but wouldn't get the covid vaccine because "you don't know what's in it"

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago (14 children)

online arguments never change minds, they only serve to galvanize each persons prior beliefs

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 15 points 5 days ago

Its not about changing your opponent's mind. It's about the people reading along. You aren't talking to your opponent. You're talking to the audience you share with that opponent. Never forget that.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I live in rual northern Nevada and everyone here is hardcore brainwashed republicans. I used to try to correct them when they said dumb shit but it just made me look stupid, so now I just watch and listen to there ramblings. It’s more entertaining for me and less of a headache.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I lived in rural Idaho during the Obama years and I can't count the times I had to hear people joking about lynching him. My kids even reported to me their peers would regularly fantasize about shooting the President on the school bus. It was a real eye opener for me and I lost what little respect I had for conservatives.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Same here, actually that is still a thing. The day after Obama won in 2008 I came to work you would’ve thought a second 9/11 had happened. People were legitimately depressed and in raged by it.

[–] Bitflip@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 days ago

Its unethical to have a battle of wits against an unarmed opponent.

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

The denominator is divisible by the numerator.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gaiussabinus@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Truthtwopower@lemmy.zip 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Every maga I come across. Just a bag full of excuses for pedophiles.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Muffi@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›