this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
546 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29859 readers
2309 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The position puts her at odds with some on the left, such as Rep. Ro Khanna, another potential 2028 contender, who said he wants to find “common ground” with people like Greene.

In a conversation Friday at the University of Chicago Institute of Politics moderated by David Axelrod, the onetime political strategist to President Barack Obama, a student asked Ocasio-Cortez whether she stood by past remarks that there were “legitimate white supremacist sympathizers at the core of the House of Representatives caucus” and, if so, why she worked with some of them.

Ocasio-Cortez did stand by them and said she wasn’t scared of reaching across the aisle, holding up her work with Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn. But she set a clear boundary.

“I personally do not trust someone like Marjorie Taylor Greene, a proven bigot and antisemite, on the issue of what is good for Gazans and Israelis,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “I don’t think it benefits our movement in that instance to align the left with white nationalists. I don’t think it serves us.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] valar@lemmy.ca 124 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd think it would be obvious as a general principle, and I'm kind of surprised that AOC's position is more strict: Don't trust MTG on Gaza or Israel.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Should just be in general for sure. But i feel like people dont realize that MTG is just against israel becausing she is a raging racist who thinks the jewish cabal is running the world with space lasers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slowmolaggins@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 week ago

What's obvious to me is that our president is a pedophile and a x34 felon. Saying something is obvious, doesn't take away the possibilities. We live in a post-truth society where the idiot who screams the loudest has the most listeners.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 80 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No shit, Sherlock. I'm not mad at AOC for stating the obvious. I'm mad that she has to in the first place cos Democrats are fucking stupid. Not as stupid as Republicans, but still stupid.

Their apologists just don't get it as well. Dems need to stop talking big and be big. Stop saying you're the resistance and not verbally flogging the people who vote Trump appointees or funding of ICE. They need to stop portraying themselves as a weak party against the Republicans.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The fact that she even had to say it to remind people is completely insane

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

She hasn't changed. She joined MAGA for greedy and selfish reason, and she left for the same reasons. She will knife anyone left of her in the back the moment it becomes benificial.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

MTG says whatever MTG thinks will benefit MTG the most. End of story. She has no morality at all other than what will conveniently serve herself first.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Empty G is still full blown MAGA, she just recognizes that Trump is heading for the exit soon, and as in all Cults of Personality, there is no #2. She's angling to be the new MAGA leader, attracting those who have soured on Trump, as well as weak-willed Trad Dems, to give her an edge over those that only draw from MAGA.

Don't fall for it, she's still the same psychopath she's always been. Hating Trump is a low bar, she's going to have to do better than that.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think it's all that nefarious.

I think she was a true believer up until she started forcefully being exposed to all the info and having good reason to pay attention to it.

And it's not hard to figure out that it's all bullshit.

Regardless, she's still the "Jewish Space Lasers" person, and I don't see why Democrats would be tempted to trust her on anything.

Greene just doesn't care about holding her job enough to carry Trump's bullshit once she recognizes it as bullshit. That's why she's going to be out of politics like every other Republican who wouldn't carry Trump's bullshit and therefore are no longer in office.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, she's STILL a true believer, she's just separated MAGA from Trump, which is something very few politicians have done publicly, and very, very few voters have done.

It's going to backfire. If MAGAs can't vote for Trump, they're going to want to vote for whoever Trump endorses, and it ain't gonna be her.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It'll be easy to prove me wrong. I just don't think she's that ambitious. She's already got hers, right? I, personally, gave her thousands of dollars (sold index funds as she bought on insider knowledge), and she has healthcare for life.

Yeah, well said

[–] Monte_Crisco@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why is it that during every MTG interview from a mainstream journalist, wherein MTG criticizes Trump for doing something illegal, the journalist NEVER asks her (or any Republican congressman in a similar situation) the very basic fucking question…

So… as the party in power… what the fuck are you going to do about it?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

On November 21, 2025, Greene announced that she would resign from her seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, with the resignation going into effect on January 5, 2026.[162][163] Greene said that Trump attacked her over her support for the anti-AIPAC organization Track AIPAC and the release of the Epstein files.[164] In mid-December, BBC News summarized the Trump–Greene feud as beginning with "her backing of a full release of the government files connected to the Jeffrey Epstein underage sex-trafficking case – long a source of conservative conspiracy theories. It broadened, however, into a critique of Trump's Middle East policy and accusations of his failure to address cost-of-living and healthcare concerns for low-income American voters."[165]

Resign, apparently. Which is great for her - now she can criticize Trump, but can't be expected to do anything about anything he's doing.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Why not? I don’t think we’ve ever been burned by unskeptically welcoming conservatives into the progressive movement.

(/s, obviously)

[–] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago

Ducking Fuh.

I agree! Yet Another based take from AOC!

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think MTG is the republican party hedging their bets

They know they are going to suffer the biggest landslide in history at the next election, they elected a conman and openly conned the country.

If MTG offers a softer more dem-lite vision then she may well take some of the floaters, Indies and undecideds. The GOP won't be able to campaign with trump politics so they will need to mirror the democrats to win a few votes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Marjorie Taylor Greene is bat shit insane, or at least she doesn't mind acting like it. She is as untrustworthy as any lying reality denying MAGA idiot.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wouldn’t trust MTG with a squirt gun at a swimming pool. Yes we all make mistakes and say and do dump things. Yes she has turned her back on Donny and maga but I do believe the minute he dies she will try to recapture the maga movement and mold it in her favor. And when this fails she will just grift another hatful movement. Yes she is still speaking out about Epstein which I will give her credit for but other than that stfu bitch. When we get our country back or what’s left of it you will still go to prison for all the crimes, lies, and pain you caused people. We will at least make sure your last meal is tasty Marge.

she's right; her last bill was a bill criminalising trans people and she broke with trump because trump wasn't racist enough.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago

Nobody should trust MTG

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

MTG is already promoting horse paste for hanta virus.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Why would anyone trust MTG?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

MTG is a truly odious individual with shit for brains and extremely offensive views and zero practical prescriptions for any of America’s problems. She should fuck off into private life.

You could put MTG at the deepest parts of the ocean and she still wouldn't be far enough for me to feel safe.

[–] texture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

no one should trust that lady, got it.

edit - i obviously mean MTG smh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CarpalTunnelButt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Republicans who acknowledge the war in Iran is wrong are moving to our position. We won't trust them to lead us, but if they have influence over their party, then I think it's beneficial to show that to their supporters and get them on the side against genocide, illegal wars, and war crimes. I believe Ro Khana realizes this is an issue that can unite the country in the same way the Epstein files has. If we are winning over the right and bringing them to sanity on a single, gigantic issue, that is a good thing.

load more comments
view more: next ›