this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
538 points (97.5% liked)

me_irl

8000 readers
818 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He's got a job and a family; how does he do it?
Balances work with his wife's underwhelming cooking
He's got all the answers that I wanna know
How can I be what I am, but 40 years ago?
Gee whiz, he got it and he flaunts
I am the thing he is, but he is it when I want
I guess it's true that some people really got to fight to survive
And some people are white guys in 1985

Bo Burnham - 1985

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't wanna pay for anything
Clothes and food and drugs for free
If it was 1970
I'd have a job at a factory
I am a man that's made of meat
And you're on the internet looking at feet
I hate almost everything that I see
And I just wanna disappear

Viagra Boys - Man Made of Meat

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If it was 1970

I’d have a job at a factory

I recommend anyone nostalgic for the factory jobs of the 1970s to watch the movie "Blue Collar".

The frustrating thing about nostalgia is that it's got you pining for the rotten deals of yesteryear instead of organizing for a less-shitty sandwich next year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abc@suppo.fi 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Amazing song like pretty much everything else in that set.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I did not expect the deluxe edition to be 25 additional bangers. lol

[–] Beth@piefed.social 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Just finally landed a “starter” home. 325k. During comparisons we looked at old listings of it being half that a decade ago. I still feel lucky because that’s “cheap” for a good neighborhood where I am. Mortgage and all rolled together comes in ar only $200 higher than my current rent, which will surely continue to rise every year unlike my fixed mortgage. But saving up that down payment in this economy took everything I had even with a decent salary.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Note that if property values continue to increase, then your property tax will also increase. Therefore, your monthly payments on your mortgage can increase.

When I bought my home in 2020, my mortgage was a flat $2,600 to the penny. Now it's $2850.

The one good thing about that though is that property tax is deducted from your income, so you get 30 or 40% of that back at the end of the year depending on your overall tax bracket, and depending on where you live and what your property taxes are once you sum up the entire year, even though your mortgage is $200 more, you could actually be paying less in total.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not if you don't make enough to itemize deductions. Ask how I know 😮‍💨

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When I bought my home in 2020, my mortgage was a flat $2,600 to the penny. Now it’s $2850.

Okay, but $250 over six years is a pittance compared to the equivalent hikes in rent.

Like, I agree, property taxes keep creeping up on us. But so do fuel and food costs, utilities, etc. That's inflation for you. I'm also getting COA in my annual wage, so you could argue that I'm "part of the problem".

Compare that to some landlord who can spike your rent because the market gets a bit tight, because the interest on their debt ticked up, because they want an excuse to renovate and are looking to scare people out of their leases, because they think they can squeeze us a bit harder, or for no reason at all. I watched my $800/mo rent balloon to $2000/mo over the five years before I bought a home.

Getting a fixed rate mortgage is pretty much always better than renting, unless you need to change addressed every couple of years anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We just did the same thing, it's crazy. How can rent be SO EXPENSIVE, when, now that we finally got into a house, our payment is only a few hundred more, but we've tripled our square footage, and we have a garage, and a little bit of land. It's crazy.

That payment includes insurance and taxes too. Wild.

Granted house upkeep takes money, and effort. But still.

[–] Beth@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Right? But you can do those projects and know you own the thing. And if you can save for a down payment, you can set money aside for those projects along the way as well.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

which will surely continue to rise every year unlike my fixed mortgage

Pretty much the #1 reason to buy a home. I got into a $350k house in 2014, knocked my mortgage down to 3% during the COVID shock, and have been happily paying under $1/sqft for the last twelve years. No idea what I'm going to do when my son outgrows his tiny bedroom. But that's a problem for 10 years from now. Maybe we'll see another housing crash before then.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Your mortgage will likely stay the same but I have some bad news about insurance and property taxes

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Great job though. Persistence really pays off. My wife and I bought a house in an ok neighborhood and struggled to pay it off for almost ten years. When covid hit and they were offering 2% loans we had about $20k left to pay on it. By the time we found the next place we wanted and saved a down payment, prices had shot up, interest rates were higher, but we ended up buying points instead of using all of our money for down payment and got our current interest rate below 3%. Our old house, which was paid off, sat on the market for almost 3 months before we sold it, put all the money toward our current home, and did a refinance for the same interest rate for six figures less.

Starter homes are especially great when you know it's a starter home. You don't dump a ton of money into it, everything becomes "will this decision add value when we sell it" and you don't get emotionally tied to it. It's a stepping stone to get you where you want to be.

[–] hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I respectfully disagree with that final statement. At least, my opinion on it differs from yours. Which is fine.

We're in our first starter home right now, and we definitely have plans to make changes that will potentially drop its resell value. Why? Because we live here now, and probably for the next decade, and we want to fix things that annoy us.

Namely we plan to knock out a wall to make the kitchen/dining more open, and it'll flow better into the living room too. But then it goes from a 3 bedroom house, to 2 🤷‍♂️

My in-laws just built a house, and I kind of hate it. They even dislike a lot of things about it, but everything they did to build that house, every decision, was 100% about resale. I don't even mean big stuff, I mean every little detail. Like they're living in a showroom. That's just not for me.

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I can understand your point. We did some minor changes for my wife's peace of mind, but we bought the home with the idea that it wasn't our forever home. The one we're in now we are keeping though. We've remodeled the previous owners remodeled kitchen... Added things to the house that do nothing for value, but the pressure of knowing we're going to have to resell it is completely gone.

We had a 15 year mortgage on the old house and the whole point was to pay it off and get rid of it while we looked for something better. We never even painted the walls, it was still contractor beige when we left. Our house was livable though and already open concept, so we didn't really have to make any major changes to it. We just turbo cash dumped into the principal at every chance.

That being said, if my wife would have had any major issues, we would have changed things. It was just "acceptable" enough for us to treat it like a long ass lease and leave it almost like we found it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abc@suppo.fi 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I can get roughly 3000 square feet house built in the 2000s for 325keuros. In a stable neighborhood with good schools and lots of nature.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

As a Texas resident, I'll say one of the ugliest turns of the last decade has been the hollowing out of the local schools and parks. What used to be some of the biggest selling points of our neighborhood is gearing up to be an absolute blight.

[–] arschflugkoerper@feddit.org 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What does starter home mean?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Single bedroom house that is supposed to be a lot cheaper than the "family homes," that would be in the same area. A 2 BR home may qualify as well. The issue is that they haven't built any of these type of houses in over 60 years, and the prices are jacked sky high.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago

A smaller/older/cheaper home, specifically in a country where it is expected to be sellable for a profit later to "climb the housing ladder" with a more expensive house (and repeat until maybe downsizing after retirement).

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In 2020 I was lucky that I had the opportunity to live rent-free with my girlfriend's parents for a year to save up the 5% down payment required for first-time homebuyers. I had to get the cheapest, most run-down house with bars on the windows because the town was that bad. Still, living there for 4 years let me build up capital, and now I sold it and got a pretty nice place to live instead.

I thought I'd never get a house for all the reasons you posted, but it was possible, if only barely after a year of embarrassment and the luck to even have that. I hope you get the opportunity to save up that money somehow, too. It changes your life to have a house that basically puts your monthly housing money to paying off an investment rather than paying off your landlord's investment instead.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Every single millennial homeowner I know managed to get their house one of two ways: get married in 2008 to a Gen-X doctor who can afford to buy a foreclosure when the market tanked, or get massive financial help from their parents.

That's it. Those are the options. And unless you've got a time machine, I think the first one is off the table by now.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 7 points 2 weeks ago

Basically, yeah. If you don't already have money saved up, and you don't have someone who can cover the down payment for you, you need some method of living rent free for enough time to get $15-20k, at least in Minneapolis, where I live. The starter home I got for $200k in 2020 is now worth $250k, so the $10k down payment I saved up would now need to be $12.5k for first-time homebuyers.

Crazy that such a piece of crap house is worth so much more when the neighborhood has only gotten worse, but it shows that even just sitting on the house for a few years doing nothing to it like I did will net you some hefty capital. I sold my house after only 4 years, and after paying off the rest of the mortgage and the realtor fees, I had a nearly $50k check to show for it, thanks to what little of the mortgage I'd managed to actually pay down combined with the $30k increase in the price of the house in that time.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Gen Z here, bought a small home with 3% down first homeowners loan.

Honestly the only thing going for me was being married. Dual income was a big step up, but other than that it was just me and my wife. We don't even make all that much, I have a degree in anthropology lol. No money from either of our parents.

We did rent the cheapest place we could find, and that neighborhood was rough. I will say if we tried to buy our house again today I'm not sure we could. Interest rates and home values have shot up like crazy. It only taken about 4 years for things to get that crazy.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I got curious to see what it would be like if I refinanced my house.

My current mortgage that I'm paying $2850 on would be over $4,000 with today's interest rates.

I literally could not afford to live where I'm living if I hadn't moved when I did.

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

I moved to another country, but it still took until my early 40s.

[–] fascicle@leminal.space 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I got lucky my parents were able to rent me and my wife the garage for about 4 years at a discount. Then since my in-laws were renting a house we decided to team up and go half on a house. This way we both got out of renting and we can all pitch in to cover the mortgage, we converted the garage to be our living room/kitchen and put a wall in the hallway so essentially the house is cut in half. Our commutes increased a ton to go to work, but its so much nicer on the weekends being away from a major city

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 2 weeks ago

My first apartment, in the early 80s, was $300, and I couldn't afford it on my $3.35 minimum wage salary, so I had a roommate.

After about 2 years, I got a real job, and my roommate decided to move out at the same time. I was stressing about finding a new roommate when I realized I could afford to pay for the entire place myself. I haven't had a roommate since.

Well, until I got married, and later had a kid. I'm still not convinced it was the better move.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The spirit of this is absolutely correct, but where is a "starter home" $800K?

[–] Dkiscoo@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Thanks. Yeah I figured this was a weird definition thing..

Zillow defines a starter home as one in the lowest third of home values in a given region.

To be sure, the typical starter home still costs far less than $1 million at just under $199,000, Zillow noted. Overall, the median home costs nearly $418,000, according to the National Association of Realtors. 

Again I am not doubting the point, but my personal definition of starter home would be basically "the cheapest livable home with minimal standards applied". Given that I live in a metro area but have seen homes for $450-500K which are decent, reading $800K was a starter was surprising to me.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it a metro area with significant sprawl?

Median list price in Massachusetts is $716,000 and most houses still go from listed to pending in around 8 days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah starter home should be based on median salary for the area, not the product itself. That just becomes inconvenient because then 95%+ of homes would fall out of that range and fuck the narrative even harder.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I live in Adelaide Australia, I have approval for a 800k loan and have been unable to buy anything. Every house always sells for 50-100k more than the asking price and it's just stupid - and building new is even worse (just as expensive and the quality is terrible).

Gonna look at some crack shacks next.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If you are paying that much for a starter home, you are paying for the location. Not saying houses are cheap, but they are only that crazy in a high cost of living area. It's not really surprising that houses are expensive in places where everything is expensive. I bought a 2 bedroom home for $175k a few years ago in a city with a population of 10k.

[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 weeks ago

Jobs are in population centers, though

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The problem is finding a cheap house in a place where you can also get a job. The smaller the town, the less jobs (ymmv)

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

My sister recently moved from The large city where we both lived to South Carolina. When I visit she takes me to look at houses that I could buy for less than what I'm paying now. That's all great for her, who works remotely and makes the same salary she made here, her husband works for the same company as me and he took a massive payout to transfer there. He made about twice what I do and now he's making less than me for a job with more responsibilities.

load more comments
view more: next ›