this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
31 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

6953 readers
174 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wave Google good-bye!

As enshittification intensify, move away from Google and providers that depend on it. There are alternative providers. There's probably a local one that use libre software.

[–] 45o3b@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

A meta-aggregator of alternatives: https://theprivacywiki.com/

[–] lemmysmash@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hmm....

I don't like captcha, (or more specifically; I don't like being farmed for AI training) however I understand the need to filter out bots vs humans.

I really don't like the idea of being forced to use a google approved operating system and/or provide documents to prove my legal identity. (With a vague promise that my data will deleted, after it's distributed to a hundred different affiliates that don't bother with privacy...)

But this is kind of intriguing, at least on the surface. If you can just point a camera at a bland surface like paper or a blank wall, then perform some hand gestures, to satisfy the 'I'm human' test. Without being forced to use anything more. I'd be far happier with that, than I am with the current proposals of 'upload your govt ID to everyone that asks, to prove you exist. Trust us, we'll all delete it immediately after, perhaps throw in a facial scan while we're at it, wouldn't want to be uncertain....'

So, what's the catch? I'm sure the footage can and will be used to improve AI video rendering, particularly hands obviously. At least you can choose a background that's not identifiable, and keep the rest of the scene empty (hopefully?)

Is it going to function on linix PCs with whatever flavor of FOSS or highly customised browser people want to run? Or are people still going to be told, 'pick a corporate overlord, buy one of their devices and don't you dare modify it, or good luck accessing modern society.'?

I'm not hopeful of the answers to those questions.