this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
24 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9317 readers
295 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

with increased salaries, right?

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] dropdrip@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Of course, comrade. Management were previously unaware of their value; this has been rectified and the unmistakable value is now seen!

[–] dropdrip@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OP, was the article made by AI? It's such a short read, yet has a table-of-contents, FAQ and too many sub-headings. I won't comment on AI's utility, but this is a mess of an article. That's not a critique of AI--website articles turned into incoherent messes before the public could utilize such software. An observation is that AI cannot stop this degradation, but only accelerates it...

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I just choose not to spend my brainpower thinking about these things to be honest. I only really care if the article had content I care about not how it was written. And that said, I've seen far worse articles than that long before LLMs were around.