top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 78 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's definitely not healthy, but this isn't going to fix the birth rate.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 months ago (30 children)

    Make babies! It's illegal to be lonely!

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    And wasn't China very recently concerned about their birthrate being too high? One Child Policy?

    Now they're already concerned about their birth rate being too low?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    The one-child policy was abolished in 2015, but birth rates have continued to decline after that. They currently have one of the world's lowest fertility rates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 55 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    It’s clearly not a healthy thing to exist.

    It is the worst of para social relationships, amped up by 100x. And is only going to get more exploitative.

    But just on a level of building up the skills to have a relationship, it’s training kids to expect someone who always says yes, always affirms them, will never challenge them to grow…

    Relationships are hard. You have to learn to love people and how to do that, and you have to learn to not be selfish, which is the opposite of what LLMs tend to encourage.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 44 points 2 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 45 points 2 months ago* (7 children)

    AI girl/boyfriends are fucking addictions latching onto people vulnerbilities.

    This ban is nothing but good, but no one thing will fix child birth rates, nor the reason for the addiction in the first place, I'll agree with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    It is funny to me that china can pretend not to be a capitalist nation while displaying every symptom of capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    You can argue that you have capitalism if transactions are happening. Which means the word kind of looses it's meaning because it's so broad.

    But people will often define it on how much market control the state displays.

    You can then argue that China has market control on key aspects of important sectors. Which they do, but still with an approach, that they have private companies with government subsidies.

    But most of all, the need for distance to the world capitalism is more a marketing thing. Unless they believe that capitalism is just a tool to achieve socialism, which also can be true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    I would argue a capitalist nation is any one that allows the conversion of natural resources into private (not personal) property by law, and facilitates the exploitation of those resources through a market.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You know what else fixes the birth rate? Making life less shitty and giving people enough money to be able to raise children.

    In the meantime, negative birth rate is just self-correction of asshole dictatorships. Can't make money line go up if birth line go down.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Sperm counts are tanking worldwide while PFAS chems are being legalized and clean energy projects are shut down in favor of fossil fuels. Nature doesn't gaf, and will correct the unhealthy scenario. Humans are not the fittest if they destroy their own species by toxifying the environment. There's only so much we can do with a sperm count of zero. Even in a handmaid's tale scenario, a multiple of zero is zero.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago

    I kind of think everywhere probably should, that's probably the strangest thing it's like falling in love with a microwave.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    this will just spin up a blackmarket waifu market

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Black market GFs that shit is going to be unhinged.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Declining social and economic conditions affect birthrates more than this.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm a bit confused as to why this is related to 1984. I understand banning AI “boyfriends” and “girlfriends” could be seen as a form of censorship, though. But I also think it’s kind of a good thing; some people genuinely believed these AI were their real relationships and might avoid any real relationships.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    It is a sarcastic observation of the shallow and reductive take that "nineteen eighty four is when the government does something i don't like!".

    I find it less likely that anyone who uses lemmy would sincerely think it is actually good that people become parasocially addicted to a hallucination box that has been finely tuned to lie to them as convincingly as possible.

    However, I admit this inference is doing a lot of gravy lifting; this is, after all, why Poe's Law exists. There are so very many excessively dim, narrow-minded, and ignorant people who WOULD indeed unironically cry "1984!!" whenever any government does anything that such a person being right here, right now, is always a statistically significant possibility that cannot be dismissed out of hand without risk.

    I am giving the person to whom you are replying a generous benefit of a doubt, to be fair...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I think a lot of world problems would be solved if these things were encouraged instead. If someone needs their romantic partner to be a mindless sycophant, I would rather them have that with a machine than try to abuse a human person into serving them as would be more traditional. More children being born in situations other than exploitation and manipulation could only be a good thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›