this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

51036 readers
1128 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

-- and they both punch left; exactly as conservatives like to do.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

The liberals are still doing this in 2025. We shouldn't really be surprised I spose.

[–] u_die_for_elmer@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (8 children)

I consider tankies to be on the right end of the socialist spectrum, so when I say it I'm punching right. They're still comrades even if they are miss guided by state-capitalist governments. Cheers

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

lmao

anti-communism is always fascist. When you engage in "tankie punching" you engage in fascist anti-communism

[–] u_die_for_elmer@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Sure. Never analyze or critique anything. Got U

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago

How do you get from “never critique anything” to “I can be an anti-communist ideologue”?

[–] o_d@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Call it whatever the fuck you want. It's working 100 million times better than this shit we're doing. It's lead to the most rapid increase of quality of life in human history for it's people. Do you really think they care what you think about their government not being socialist enough?

Poverty is not socialism. To uphold socialism, a socialism that is to be superior to capitalism, it is imperative first and foremost to eliminate poverty.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Do you believe there has ever been a socialist state, even one?

[–] u_die_for_elmer@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Russia from 1917 till about 1928. A slow, but through counter revolution took place.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don't think I've run into someone that thinks the NEP was authentically Socialist, but the collectivized, publicly owned and planned economy that defined the Soviet Union for the majority of its existence as "counter-revolutionary." The NEP had more literal bourgeoisie and was defined by controlled markets, it's still a form of Socialism but it's common to deny it that along that basis. Are you a Bukharinist? Do those even exist? Even then, Bukharin seemed to just want to lengthen the NEP, not perpetuate it forever.

Genuinely, this is a take I haven't seen spelled out before. I don't agree, of course, but I'm curious what your reasoning is.

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 4 months ago

V I B E S B A S E D A N A L Y S I S

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

If you're one of those people who just considers "tankie" to be a synonym for "Marxist-leninist" then I suppose I agree, but I think the term is used too nebulously to meaningfully place on the political spectrum.

[–] SlayGuevara@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Lemmygrad admin here. I normally don't look at reports from other instances but for this I had to make an exception. Probably the dumbest shit I have read so far lmao.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

I think if you're comparing "degrees" of left vs right, at that point you're missing the forest for the trees. Ultimately, Anarchists and Marxists disagree on strategy and end goal, but both oppose Capitalism and Imperialism. At that point, there really isn't a "more" or "less" left, there's just differences in analysis and what must be done to get from A to B, as well as what B itself is.

[–] blame@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago
[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Posting in a thread that will have 300 comments and 20 visible on hexbear

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Carl@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

True but only for terminally online liberals. I still haven't heard anyone in real life ever use that word.

[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It will happen in a few years from now.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 4 months ago

Bet is going to be conservatives using it to talk about anyone left to Hitler

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Just replace "woke" with "russian".

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Its become the boomer equivalent of calling everything bad communist.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Truly. Any moderate support for AES? Immediately labeled a tankie, I've seen Anarchists and even Liberals labeled a tankie. The term only exists to punch left from the Liberal POV, just like "Woke" is used to punch anything left of fascism.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago

Any moderate support for a non-US aligned capitalist country as well

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Tankie doesn't really mean anything to me anymore. Even self-proclaimed tankies often have trouble defining it in a way that is consistent among leftist groups.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I believe in reclaiming "tankie" in the same way as "queer." Schoolyard bullies don't really care to distinguish between the many different labels encompassed by LGBT+, and so they inadvertently invented a term that could be very inclusive and all encompassing, even if you're still figuring out who you are, you call always fall back on "queer" to give the general idea.

In the same way, the term "tankie" gets applied to people of all sorts of different left ideologies. There are significant differences between different leftist ideologies, but our critics don't care to understand or distinguish between them, so I consider tankie to be a similarly inclusive term. Do you support anything that any socialist government has ever done? Do you think Cuba had an effective literacy program? Congratulations, you're a tankie, welcome to the club.

Note that my identifying with the term isn't really an invitation for people to use it. But, you know, if people want to keep using it as this broad, meaningless term that lumps a bunch of people together, as I see it, it only works to our advantage as "tankies," it pushes people towards us and helps us remember what we have in common instead of fighting over our differences. So I'm not exactly going to fight the label particularly hard.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago (9 children)

generally it vaguely means "communists" as well as "anti-imperialists", with the caveat that left communists are excluded as a separate thing

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Tankie always meant a fan of authoritarianism but not of the nazi variety. And hand to hand with that goes hate for America, but hate for America isn't enough on it's own, it should be paired with love of Strong Hand Of The East.
Tankie thinks China, Russia, North Korea are just swell, and not because of some underlying ideology, but because they have an authoritarian model of governance and generally in opposition to the west to some degree.
And that's the reason why it's so hard to define for some people, boiled down to it's definition, it's very hard to spin into something universally good, so talking to a general public they have to do what authoritarian lovers from the other side of the spectrum call "hiding the power lever", which muddies the water.

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

China, Russia, North Korea

Conveniently all enemies of the US State Department. Don't those tankies know that these countries are bad because checks notes they do the authoritarianisms.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Countries that do authitarianism become bad, yes. That's exactly how it works, glad you're getting it.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

I can't believe anyone would enforce class interests with violence, instead of debating tenants out of houses they're in arrears for. Smh

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What's authoritarianism, and how does a country do it?

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago
[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

Yes, seriously. Liberals love vaguely coded moralisms and ideals, but they never specify what they mean systematically. America is more "authoritarian" by any definition I can conceive due to its hundreds year history of slavery, imperialist war and mass incarceration than any other country on earth

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

On some level when you're doing sophistry like this do you understand you're acting real stupid?

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

America is the most authoritarian nation in human history

They have the highest incarceration rate of all time, and have destroyed the sovereignty of billions of people

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago

"Liberal" is just

load more comments
view more: next ›