this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
206 points (97.2% liked)

World News

57519 readers
1531 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Back at the end of the last century when search engines first were gaining popularity, your lycoses and search cactuses and ask Jeeves and dogpile and what not, I'm pretty sure there were stories of people taking what they found as true without considering sources or getting multiple reliable sources too.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I think people were turning off overpasses when Apple Navigation came out too. Despite them obviously driving on an overpass.

[–] ergonomic_importer@piefed.ca 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI just wanted to wipe out 25 acres to make room for another datacentre /s

[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Hey it's the torment nexus! Finally!

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I can't believe he even told anyone he was stupid enough to have an AI tell him a chemical name, go buy a shit ton of it, and poison 25 acres of crops with it without bothering to check with anyone or do anything to be certain the chemical was safe for his crop.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That does make me curious about how this story went from a single farmer on small 25 acre farm in China to an international news story.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

If you're an online news source and you write a story combining AI and doing something stupid you get a billion clicks.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Or better yet, to not test on a smaller area first…

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Always have to drink a little bit first to make sure it's safe for the crops. Just a few ounces.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's so misleading how these AI products are marketed as all knowing super smart knowledge sources. While in reality, even if they don't hallucinate bullshit, it's trained on the internet mostly. So at best these things have the knowledge of an average Reddit poster. What does an average Reddit shit poster know about farming? Jack shit...

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It's so goddamn stupid. I used AI for the first timr in years, because i needed some help with stl files to 3d print. On one hand i was surprised how well it worked, on the other hand it was pretty clear that it had basically no idea what it was doing, but like you said, the confidence of an average redditor. One part was pretty much perfect, but i asked it to change a small part and it deleted a whole section so it wasn't connected anymore. I was like: wtf was that? It's not connected and it went: hah, i see the problem now and did the same thing over and over. One part was too big for the buildplate so i had to segment it. It said: if you angle it 45 degrees, it fits exactly on the buildplate. (I specified the buildplate) i thought that's pretty neat, opened the slicer and it was comically how much it didn't fit. I told it that it's way too big and it just went: my mistake, i see it now.

It doesn't, it doesn't know jack shit and i'm starting to believe that people who use AI for daily usage or serious issues or think that AI is actually some intelligent being might just be dumb as fuck.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 1 points 12 minutes ago

You see it with code too. Constant refactoring, adding states to enums when they aren't necessary, "beautifying" the code by adding useless checks, tests etc. The worst is when you got concurrency: focusing extremely on keeping protected sections small it keeps unnecessarily adding temporary variables, shared pointers etc. It's so afraid of locks and data races the boilerplate for concurrency grows and grows.

Reviewing such code is a pain. I feel like just adding comments like "why are you doing this" "justify this" "what does this have to do with your objective" and let my coworkers figure it out.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I always think of George Carlin whenever people tell me how smart they think AI is: “Think of how dumb the average person is and then think about how half of them are dumber than that.

I deal with the general public every day for my job. People do the most brain dead shit or tell me the most insane things I’ve ever heard on a daily basis. I’ve had customers argue with me that I must be wrong because ChatGPT told them the problem was one thing, and I’m saying it’s something else. The most idiotic was when my solution was about a 1/4 the price, but the AI said it had to be something else so the customer wanted a second opinion from all different technician.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Sounds like AI watched the Fight Club scene with the billboard "Did you know you can use old motor oil to fertilize your lawn?"

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

So I may have eaten that halfwit's production...

[–] ReignOfTerror@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Maybe this is where the diarrhea lettuce is coming from

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

No, but you might be eating another halfwit's chemical cocktail that didn't kill the crops

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Well no, because the crop died.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I made a comment like this the other day. like 80% of the time essentially ok answer. not necessarily the best. 20% something wack but can sound reasonable. honestly I think that 80% is in my head from like months ago because I feel like the free ones I screw around with to be conversant have sorta gotten worse.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Jeremy Clarkson will have to rewrite the new season of Clarkson's Farm...

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clarkson farm had AI mapped field as to where to plant seeds based on ai analysing data on the ground quality, he praised it and while I'm no expert at farming, i do come from a farm and I remember this being a big waste everyone just accepts.

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They didn’t use AI, they used an EMI and advanced technology to apply a data driven approach.

Then they got a drought. Turns out, even if you use technology and data to plant in a manner to optimize your yield you still need rain to grow things.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And this is why I dislike the term “AI”…

Someone here said it’s now a synonym for “technology.” At the moment I thought that was hyperbole, but really it’s about right.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 1 points 17 hours ago

It's all over the place.

Marketing teams throw the word AI into ads because it sells.

People are getting accustomed to assuming "AI" means smart.

It's a shit word and I can't wait for the bubble to pop. I say that as a marketer forced to shove the world AI everywhere.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Apparently any automation is now 'AI'.