this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
461 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

22285 readers
860 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today, we’re announcing the Official Elon Musk is a Sad Little Bitch with No Friends Monument Design CommitteeFor just $10, you can join a movement of like-minded people working together to force a moment of introspection upon the world’s richest, ugliest little bitch.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 69 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is there any way to make the monument noisy as fuck and wildly carcinogenic for those living nearby?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago

wildly carcinogenic

Background noise for Texas.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I'm thinking more like tungsten carbide wind chimes with a plutonium-gallium core in each chime. It could flash blue.

[–] Concave1142@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago

How about something visible from space so it shows up when flown over and more importantly, when satellite maps are updated.

Grasses / trees planted in a shape or phrase would be cool.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Who wants to fuck with Elon Musk?

Kalshi odds are saying most people think Elon's hoping for the answer to be "children."

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Who cares what a shitty gambling site "says"?

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You seem to have missed the joke.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You screwed your joke by unnecessarily attaching it to a brand and making it look like an ad.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Or it was a simple layered joke making fun of both Elon's pedophilia and that things that fucked up are actually allowed on those shit gambling sites.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 8 points 6 days ago

settle down yall

[–] 5318008@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well, it's the aggregated opinion of people who use the site. Kalshi doesn't set the price; people making the bets set the price based on the odds others are willing to accept.

There's a sampling bias for sure, but since the odds given for this bet are based on how much people are willing to pay for that bet, this gives a very good approximation for how people actually feel about something.

It actually ends up being more reliable than most opinion polls in that way.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Besides the fact they nobody knows what is being done behind the scenes to ensure results are (or aren't) fair, using a sample of individuals that are all attempting to play the system against each other deeply and irreparably biases the data.

On top of that, jokes like the one I responded to and comments like yours only serve to legitimize a "service" thats sole purpose is to squeeze every penny from its users. It doesn't provide anything beneficial to anyone but its owners.

[–] 5318008@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If the contract isn't something that meets the criteria for an efficient market, then yeah, it's not something that can be used to give reasonable probabilities.

But for something like, winner of the democratic presidential primary, or the proce of gold in a month... then it's genuinely a better predictive model than what a statistician would be able to come up with.

It doesn't provide anything beneficial to anyone but its owners.

For statistics purposes, it gives me something incredibly beneficial. Simply by knowing the price of a contract, I can know with decent accuracy how likely something is to happen.

If you're not in the field, you wouldn't necessarily appreciate how valuable that is.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it’s genuinely a better predictive model than what a statistician would be able to come up with

OK, let's see the evidence for that assertion.

Simply by knowing the price of a contract, I can know with decent accuracy how likely something is to happen.

A retrospective analysis of the contract prices versus actual outcomes would also be needed. Otherwise, all you're seeing is an opinion poll conducted on a self-selected sample of people unusually prone to being greedheads. And you have no idea of the mechanisms that shape that market.

[–] 5318008@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

OK, let's see the evidence for that assertion.

Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research - PMC

There's one.

But obviously it's not a guarantee if you don't know what you're doing. We also have documentation on where these methods fall short, such as when it's based on exponential growth, rare events, or something else that humans are bad at understanding. Infectious Disease Forecasting.

But again, good statisticians are prepared to address those things.

And you have no idea of the mechanisms that shape that market.

That's even better. If I don't understand the mechanisms shaping the market, I won't be able to correctly identify predictive variables for my model. In that case, I would be better off trusting the prediction market.

Obviously it would be better if the person building the model understood the mechanisms... but that takes time and money. If you're managing 30 models, that might not be worth it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today -2 points 6 days ago
[–] clifmo@programming.dev 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)

According to the Lancet reckless indiscriminate cuts to USAID is directly responsible for 14 million deaths.

Including millions of children. Elon Musk has killed literally millions of children.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

Which is why when we are only confiscating entire fortunes from some families, and imprisoning them for their crimes, Musk will suffer a far worse fate.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)

A statue of someone putting their whole head up their own ass would be good

[–] comador@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago

A meme almost as old as the Internet, yet still worthy of Musk:

I thought a limp starship would be cool

That's a weird way to profit off of class angst

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 days ago

Cards Against Humanity might as well be run by the Onion.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 6 days ago

Every time I think of Musky, I always think about the time Musky got bullied off the internet. Always cheers me up.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

There are so many psychos in America, hard to pick one. I would rather send Sam Altman a message, I believe he is the sickest of all of them.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's wild. Sam Altman sucks but he's tame compared to others

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think you haven't heard the interview where he talks about the "suicide" of one of his employees:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suchir_Balaji

Watch this interview:

https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1o9ewpv/sam_altman_discusses_the_mysterious_death_of_his/

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I didn't say he wasn't evil. But Peter Thiel exists.

[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Unfortunately Sam Altman didn't try to steal CAH's land.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago
[–] SwissArmyKazoo@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

CAH and The Onion are bound to have a merger one of these days.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago
[–] wraekscadu@vargar.org 1 points 5 days ago

In my opinion, Musk is so worthless, that he doesn't deserve any sort of monument or anything of that sort. I've known so many losers! Do they get a monument? Naaah, they're just the butt of gossip and that's the end of it.

I know Musk is more damaging, but stuff like this is excessively ineffective at changing anything.

If you want public art, we can actually fund timeless art.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 6 days ago

Elon Musk is a fucking Theseist

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works -5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm just gonna start fucking downvoting censors

The text isn't censored

Instead, you should just read the text. And downvote all posts that have text only in an image.