this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
999 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

87979 readers
2625 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] THX1138@lemmy.ml 285 points 1 week ago (33 children)
load more comments (33 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 216 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

Ah, the Sam Reich of browsers

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 32 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Just a crying shame Mozilla has turned into a commercial nightmare making them relatively poor custodians of the only free choice we have left.

Mozilla needs to die so Firefox can live.

The income stream from Firefox is plenty for a highly technical, deeply competent, widely dispersed team could work full time on the product using something like OpenCollective.

Instead what we get is prime SF real estate offices, “competitive” SF salaries and a commercial organisation that seeks weird and increasingly desperate income streams to justify looking like “real company”.

I want an actual non-profit governing Firefox.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 182 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Anyone that uses Chrome doesn't know what a clean non ad infested website looks like so they won't notice the difference.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Every time I do IT work, I ask to install Firefox

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 21 points 1 week ago (13 children)

There are many choices and people still stay on shit browsers because of laziness.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 week ago

I actually do a pretty good job of selling it. I tell them that I can set up Firefox so using the Internet is easier. I'm 3/5 so far

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] username_1@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, you don't need to be a genius to imagine a concrete site without shit. Chrome users apparently love advertisements, trackers, pop-up windows and other similar things. Well, who are we to disagree?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 119 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Given how long ago this was announced, anybody still using Chrome doesn't care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 115 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This is gonna be so bad because now there is only uBlock origin lite and "uBlock", if you couln't guess: the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove(it's been up for some years IIRC) and i am sure that everyone will try to install this scam because they can't find the original uBlock origin (and everyone just refers to uBlock origin as uBlock which makes it worse)

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 69 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove

It's a little more complicated. uBlock was the original name, gorhil handed it off when he felt the maintenance burden became too high. Then he forked it to make his own uBlock Origin version.

At some point later uBlock was bought up by the AdBlock people, who in turn were later bought by the AdBlock Plus people.

So it's not a scam exactly, more like an inbred sideline of the royal family.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 21 points 1 week ago

Holy shit, seems to be watching a soap opera tf

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

It’s a scam because it specifically goes out of its way to not block an ad, as long as that ad pays a bribe to them. It should be called uAd.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 70 points 1 week ago (6 children)

company which makes most of it's revenue from advertising fucks with their browser's ability to remove ads. Go figure!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (12 children)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A thin layer of chromium on the surface of a metal to make it shiny and protect from corrosion.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

A browser forked from KHTML by KDE

load more comments (10 replies)

And i removed Chrome from my devices

[–] BigTurkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] isekaihero@ani.social 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think I'll be switching to librewolf at home. It can install mozilla extensions and comes with ublock origin baked in. Pulling a stunt like this is just going to drive people away from the Chrome environment. Corpos can't help but shoot themselves in the foot.

[–] MuskyLime@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Most people I know simply don't care. They will use it because it's convenient and they don't care about the privacy dangers. I can't comprehend it myself though. Drives me up the wall.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They will use it because it's convenient

Using web without ublock is amongst the most inconvenient things I've experienced

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Install Firefox with https://adnauseam.io/, it's basically ublock origin but internally clicks on every add destroying your adds profile and damaging economics of adds and conversion.

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 23 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Doesn't this just track the shit out of you? Does it also click malicious ad banners?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 36 points 1 week ago

Firefox users right now:

[–] DeadPixel@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sing it with me:

Chrome, huh, yeah.
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing, uhh….

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Damn it.

Gotta use chrome at work.

Firefox "isn't secure and isn't supported" - my it director

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

isnt secure... tell you dont understand security without telling me you don't understand security.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ublock origin lite, the natural replacement but not automatically enabled by google or microsoft. you have to go get it. https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home

an alternative is adguard's browser extension. it is free to use and open source (gpl). https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension#installation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 21 points 1 week ago

so it ~~begins~~ continues...

[–] EtzBetz@feddit.org 20 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Ah, thank god I am using Zen (Firefox fork) now for 2 years already. I totally forgot about this manifest bs. Now that Chrome introduced vertical tabs I was thinking to myself "ah, I could give it a try, having less breaking things and so on". But thanks for this reminder I will gladly stay with Zen.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›