this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
185 points (96.5% liked)

Memes

56882 readers
1131 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl 7 points 2 hours ago

POV: "Vote blue no matter who" crowd when their "Blue" candidate votes for war.

[–] Fancy_Gecko@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

they want to have their cake and eat it too

[–] calmblue75@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 hours ago

More like they want to have their cake and sell it too

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Not.

Democracy: Greek, dēmos krátos, 'people' 'rule' or rule of the people.

The people do not rule in the US so it's not a democracy.

It's hard to define what the US is. It has some democratic elements. The people are allowed to elect representatives, both at the state and Federal level, and many people are allowed to vote directly for or against certain measures through ballot initiatives at the state level, although this varies from state to state. However, our Federal representatives in the House each represent well over 700,000 people. That is a very large number of people, especially compared to most other democracies. And because we have a winner-take-all system, people who did not vote for the winning candidate may feel underrepresented or not represented at all.

I think the classification that best fits the US is Plutocracy: ploûtos krátos, 'wealth' 'rule' or rule of the wealthy. Not only do the wealthiest have a significant amount of money to invest in political causes, lobbying representatives and directly influencing elections, but they also often have significant private corporate ownership interests and control, giving them a great deal of power over the economy and access to critical resources. Even democratically elected representatives tend to be quite wealthy, or at least much wealthier than the average American voter. And even if they don't start out much wealthier, they often end up much wealthier after their time in office.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's SUPPOSED to be a democratic republic where the elected leaders vote the way their constituents would want.

But you're right it's more like a plutocracy in reality at this point

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

not at this point, it is the same as it always was

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ChojinDSL@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 hours ago

And yet their vote means nothing.

[–] sagedemage@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

It is a flawed Democracy. Lobbying money corrupts the government.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 minutes ago

It's quite literally not a democracy.

Is not even really a republic, but that is what is supposed to be. The problem is that elected representatives don't represent the people. The system is horridly corrupted at this point.

[–] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 4 hours ago

It's neither flawed nor corrupted. It's working as intended, it's just it was never intended to work for your benefit.

[–] SirSmoothAES@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 hours ago

The flaws are by design