this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
92 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

15499 readers
185 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I mean, buying memory and cups from a few years ago is still massively inflated, so if they can sell chips with that performance they’ll still make bank.

Even if the chips are less energy efficient, China has cheaper energy now thanks to investing in green energy.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

Memory doesn't move as fast as logic, machines from 5 years ago are still making current ddr5 silicon.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My God, do people actually believe that bullshit.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I’ll admit they use more coal than I thought, and 87% of their energy used from fossil fuels.

But your chart is very out of date.

They’ve quadrupled solar output since your chart ends, tripled wind, 40% more nuclear, and coal hasn’t increased for two years.

As a percentage of energy used coal is decreasing, when looking at electrify its fossil fuels are 58% now, down from 81% in 2012.

https://ourworldindata.org/profile/energy/china

Edit: apparently Canada hasn’t decreased fossil fuel use since the 1980s… what the fuck

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

That's the big scam about "energy transition": it's miserably failing. Govs put up target in % of energy generation to show fossil fuel numbers going down.

But the goal was never to achieve a ratio. The goal was to actually reduce emissions, eventually down to 0. They keep increasing. We've barely slowed down the yearly growth.

Every year, we get farther and farther from the hope of keeping Earth survivable for humans.

[–] amda@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

China still uses a LOT of coal but clearly has been going very big into renewables, mainly solar

source

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you're going to be a dumbfuck and blanketedly criticize China because you're an Imperialist, at least come correct. The chart you posted is old as fuck. Post a recent one and notice just how much progress China has made in the sector.

Then I want you to dartboard any other country on the planet and compare the green energy trajectory. China wins, and you're in denial.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks to investing in coal for a decade and a half post climate accords...

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They also have massive amounts of solar arrays.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago

Oh if thats the case, pollute away I guess.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have a tinfoil hat theory that the incumbent manufacturers have seen this coming and are basically trying to cash out before their cartel is demolished by cheap competition

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

And/or trying to use the cash to buy a technical/regulatory moat.

Idk what form that would take for memory, but it’s a pretty standard tactic for big tech, so I could see them convincing themselves it’s possible even if it’s not.

FCC approval is probably the most viable moat.