this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
963 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

6570 readers
593 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Every time I take an airplane, I feel tired and worn out. I don't want to do anything for the rest of the day except take a nap.

Trains are no problem.

The main reasons might be relatively low oxygen at altitude (cabins are usually pressurized somewhere between 1/3rd to 1/2 atmosphere) and uncomfortable seats. But I think the whole dreary process of getting on and off the airplane is part of it, too. Train stations are so much more low key, even in large metropolitan areas.

[–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You also don't have to show up 2 hours in advance to a train station and plan your entire day(or two) around a trip.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I mean, some of this is just silly and entirely based on the locations involved. For instance, a flight from Chicago to Florida is going to be cheaper and faster than Rail, and you’re not going to just hop off wherever the hell you want. And no you can’t just hop on the next one, you miss your train departure and you’re SOL.

I do also question the “safety” aspect. I’m pretty sure both trains and planes have extremely high safety rates, and are pretty much on par with each other.

Also… why is “on the ground” a bullet point? You’re on the ground 99.9% of your life, you telling me it’s not cool as shit to be flying through the air?

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

would suck tho

As it's run now, yes.

Because rail is the abused bastard and air travel has the government pay for most of it's everything.

Cars too. The government buys your roads, your gas, your parking, and part of your car for you. Only trains need to more than vaguely gesture at paying their own way in this country.

Yes, the theoretical maximum speed for a plane is faster, but we dont fly supersonic anymore, and supersonic trains still exist.

hop on hop off

As run right now, sure. If we invested half as much in trains as cars and planes? Oh, easily. And even right now, amtrak's 'trip insurance' is basically license to do exactly that. I have used it this way before.

air travel is murdering the planey

Shut the fuck up, hippie

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (12 children)

No turbulence while taking a piss or shit

Train bathrooms seem specifically designed to discourage using the bathroom while riding a train.

Also I had a laptop die from the constant vibrations destroying the hard disk drive.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The US public transportation, especially the passenger rail network is fucking pathetic.

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

Parking is cheaper No TSA fingering your asshole Tickets are cheaper Safer travel On the ground Can take the next train if late

These aren't (completely) true where I live, it's still more convenient to take a plane or even drive to go to another major city 500-600km away, which is ridiculous specially considering that it's consistently ranked among the best high speed rail systems in the world.

[–] ShittDickk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Crackheads will steal the copper from the rail and cause a 30 car derailment.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›