this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
634 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

72049 readers
2687 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fum@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (24 children)

What a bad judge.

This is another indication of how Copyright laws are bad. The whole premise of copyright has been obsolete since the proliferation of the internet.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Can I not just ask the trained AI to spit out the text of the book, verbatim?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

They aren’t capable of that. This is why you sometimes see people comparing AI to compression, which is a bad faith argument. Depending on the training, AI can make something that is easily recognizable as derivative, but is not identical or even “lossy” identical. But this scenario takes place in a vacuum that doesn’t represent the real world. Unfortunately, we are enslaved by Capitalism, which means the output, which is being sold for-profit, is competing with the very content it was trained upon. This is clearly a violation of basic ethical principles as it actively harms those people whose content was used for training.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

calm down everyone. its only legal for parasitic mega corps, the normal working people will be harassed to suicide same as before.

its only a crime if the victims was rich or perpetrator was not rich.

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This ruling stated that corporations are not allowed to pirate books to use them in training. Please read the headlines more carefully, and read the article.

Or, If a legal copy of the book is owned then it can be used for AI training.

The court is saying that no special AI book license is needed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 5 days ago

So authors must declare legally "this book must not be used for AI training unless a license is agreed on" as a clause in the book purchase.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›