this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
134 points (97.9% liked)

politics

22985 readers
3954 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk condemned rising vandalism against Tesla, blaming the political left and suggesting a conspiracy against him.

He cited incidents of arson, gunfire, and property destruction at Tesla dealerships, linking them to protests against his work with DOGE.

Trump and the DOJ have labeled the attacks "domestic terrorism," vowing arrests.

Some Tesla owners are selling their vehicles or adding bumper stickers distancing themselves from Musk, who defended Tesla as a "peaceful company," saying "I've never done anything harmful."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

His existence is harmful. I feel that I need to defend myself against him at all times, since him just existing is akin to assault and battery.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

you routinely go on social media and cheerlead for butchers committing genocide in ukraine and gaza, amongst other things.

terminal affluenza. doesnt understand that actions have consequences.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm shocked at the number of open Nazis in American "leadership". And the number of unelected "officials" tearing up our government from the inside.

[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

I am less shocked and more resigned. Been tracking the progress of the Republican party over a decade now and watching them throw out euphemism after euphemism as they just aren't needed anymore. What the reaction of shock got us back then was "alarmist" since the Conservative playbook was so layered up in dogwhistles the average person thought it was tinfoil hat fodder.

The base was being groomed to accept this as an outcome and so they were slow boiled. It was that way for the Nazis too. Each terrible move wasn't quick it was the next horrible logical conclusion of their worldview of removing the "useless" aspects of humanity. They started first in government services and then with eugenics in mental health care while dismantling queer infrastructure in cities under the same eugenics line citing them as non-reproductive genetic dead ends. Then it turned to homelessness. Then as their policies created more "useless" classes of people in the form of minorities who could not legally work because of the laws they passed they turned to liquidation of those groups. Each step was followed by a pause to make the rhetoric more callus to build off the basic premise that as an able-bodied, regularly employed, sane, cishet, white, Christian / atheist that your resources were personally being stolen from you to feed the "undeserving".

How far back can you remember Republicans on their soap box about people being undeserving of assistance or support? About people being a waste of resources or campaigning to make those people easier to stigmatize? It shouldn't be surprising after over a decade that they've been dropping the mask.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago

The paranoid part of my brain sees things like this as an attempt to piss people off enough to kick off some violent attacks, and give Trump the justification he wants to enact martial law.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

I wonder if he actually beleives that

[–] Houseman@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

He only hurt government NPCs. He is the only brain in a jar in this system we are all computer programs.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

He's got protagonist syndrome.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Ya know... I could see him thinking all his bad jokes, and online antics don't hurt anyone (not true) but the dude is decimating the federal workforce, he can't honestly believe he hasn't done anything to garner that hate. That's people's livelihoods.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

If you dont consider hacking a government to pieces harmful.... Idk what to tell you. Even hacking a regime to pieces will hurt people. You can't move fast and break things with governments and people's lives.

[–] Snarl7400@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

Fuck this POS!

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 4 weeks ago
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

You don't get to be the richest man in the world without crushing those under you. Fucking liar.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is he seriously thinking that people might have empathy for him if he says that?

[–] ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

Holy shit, I actually laughed out loud at this. "Never done anything harmful", lmfao. Get the fuck outta here.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

He's an actual sociopath

I'm not being hyperbolic, he's an actual clinically sociopathic person, of course he thinks he hasn't done harm.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Clinically psychopathic. Sociopathy is the result.

The distinction is important because neurotypical people can be raised to behave in ways that are sociopathic, both directly and indirectly. Most of the ultra wealthy who are born into wealth for example explain away the harms their lives cause others. But they still feel and express empathy in many aspects of their lives

But Musk seems genuinely like he has no genuine empathy, and like he has no comprehension of how to be a moral actor in the world. Trump is the same.

Being reasonable intelligent and born into privilege in the world that rewards sociopathy through the market system... psychopaths seem to disproportionately find themselves in positions of power. It's perverse.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›