this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
123 points (96.2% liked)

Memes

51573 readers
1335 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Chaotic good

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that would be somewhere near the free speech one

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

death death to the idf

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

That crashes the system

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

use-after free 👍 free-use after 😳

[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Sidhean@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

looks like Free Real Estate to me

[–] OmarTwoTone@lemmy.org 1 points 1 day ago

"fair elections" should be "lawful retarded".....

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure free speech is chaotic. I'm 100% for it, but it's chaotic.

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What depends on my opinions?

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if theyre lawful or chaotic, the thing of free speechis that it depends on what you have to say

Free speech is chaotic specifically because it allows chaotic speech. So free speech being chaotic doesn't depend on the speaker's opinions. A particular instance of speech being chaotic depends on the speaker's opinion. But free speech is chaotic because it's all about allowing a chaos of speech.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Free use-after? Is this a typo?

[–] SqueakyBeaver@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it's supposed to be use after free, but it isn't clear because none of the others use that layout

For those who don't know: "use after free" is a programming term that means you tried to use something that was stored in a certain place in memory after that thing was already freed (removed from that space in the memory). As a result, you get unexpected behavior. This can be exploited to allow an attacker to get a program to run anything they want.

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

I'm guessing it's because "free use" is a porn genre

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

The "use after"was used after free.

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

idk its crossposted from someone elses mastodon

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Whats evil about free parking?

[–] ragingHungryPanda@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

That's an awesome read, thanks!

[–] tfowinder@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Article argues that money spent is not recovered properly and highly subsidized for the users.

By that logic anything that gives more than it takes like road, infra, etc all are not good.

I think the whole point of having these regulations is to take side of people who use the space and regulate the private companies who would try to maximize profits while giving bare minimum required to keep things running.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

It also argues that municipalities create far too much parking space, reducing the amount of useable area in cities. This is one big reason why most US and Canadian city centers are dying, as more downtown plots are dedicated to parking, and new plots need a crazy amount parking.

New constructions all have huge parking lots like big box stores and fast food islands, surrounded by a sea of pavement. The lower density reduces propery taxes (as they're usually calculated by the number of properties, not the used land area), and increases the need for a vehicle to reach locations.

Free parking in general may help to keep things accessible to everyone (with a car), but the amount of parking is choking everyone out and increasing reliance on car manufacturers and roadwork companies.

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago

there never is

every slot is always taken

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It implies you're playing Monopoly, which is an evil game.

[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It implies that you should pay to park the car you had no choice but to drive due to lack of any credible infrastructure. In the US at least.

I mean maybe. I didn't make it, just conjecture.

[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

thats how i took it, too. their "generosity" of making something we are forced to use "free" (even though a lot of laws mandate that parking)

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

Makes sense to me!

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Free to play is good, as long as it doesn't also have microtransactions.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago

Free to play is always unsustainable without microtransactions unless the game is community hosted or open source. That doesn't represent the overwhelming majority of F2P.

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

pov: you pirated minecraft bedrock

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think that "of consequences" needs to be on there amnd it should be chaotic evil