this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
735 points (94.9% liked)

Fuck AI

2571 readers
664 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frezik@midwest.social 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Art is inherent in us. Just like the need to put boobs on mythical lizard creatures.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Drawing boobs is second only to the instinct to draw cocks.

[–] Rajkuhl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If that Heavy Metal episode of South Park has taught me anything, it's that everything looks better with boobs.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Furries: "I would like to purchase this rock."

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

The future is approaching. When society will collapse a new Furry-Stone age will begin...

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Relevant Oglaf (NSFW but not nearly as NSFW as this comic often gets): Dimorphism

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Nothing will stop real artists from making art.”

Exactly. AI images are not going to eliminate art. They just make it more difficult for artists to compete under capitalism.

The solution is to abandon capitalism. Not stop tech development.

[–] mriormro@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up first.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Busty dragonesses are not art, but this is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Supreme Court: that's not art that's pornography. I cant exactly define pornography, but "you know it when you see it."

:P

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also, if you stick a stamp on it and mail it… straight to jail.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

that generally criminalize the involvement of the United States Postal Service, […] in conveying obscene matter,[1] crime-inciting matter, or certain abortion-related matter

How specific. We know who perpetrated this law.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Haven't seen this on here yet

I've seen it 3 times already.

It has but it is always good to see.

Also Source.

[–] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Comments here are a shit show.

Here as in... They internet?

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

BEEEG DRAGOM TTS

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (8 children)

But why give a lizard boobs? They don't have boobs!

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's where the fire is stored

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Non-mammals lacking mammary glands?! Say it ain't so.

And the first thing that came to mind after typing that? Lobster-titties

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] geissi@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

Have you ever seen a giant, flying, fire breathing dragon IRL that didn't have boobs?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›