this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
370 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23117 readers
3305 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They want to go back to how it was in the 1800s

Archived copies of the article:

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago

god i can't wait to move to canada or ireland

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

American cheese product is about to become actual plastic.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

I’m glad I never really got into dairy. Occasionally I’ll eat cheese. And 2ce a year I’ll eat ice cream.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Why I didn’t drink American milk before:

In Canada, the dairy industry is regulated by the Canadian Dairy Commission, which sets standards for milk production, including quality and safety. Canadian milk is often noted for its strict regulations regarding antibiotics and hormones, and the use of growth hormones like rBST is banned.

In the USA, milk quality is regulated at both federal and state levels, with the FDA setting standards for milk safety. However, practices can vary significantly from state to state, and some farmers may use growth hormones, which can be a concern for some consumers.

"US FDA suspends milk quality tests amid workforce cuts” Aaaand another step backwards...

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

This is going to fuck up the US export market something FIERCE. The US is actually one of the largest food exporters in the world, but without proper inspection and safety checks, no country with half a brain cell is going to want to import potentially contaminated food. Whenever something slips through the cracks and some people die or get hurt from food poisoning it is always a major scandal, even if the number of people affected are in the single or double digits.

This is the type of shit that will bring the US back to the 19th century when food adulteration was rampant. Except now despite overproducing food on an unimaginable scale, they will STILL try to adulterate food with bullshit.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Other countries having food standards was one of Trump’s tariff complaints

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if you were going to do this, why would you tell everyone you're doing it?

Man it really sucks living in this shithole country run by a pack of morons.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

I hope my state secedes. The sooner blue states cut themselves loose, the better.

[–] Mooseford@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Simple solution, buy a cow and a testing lab! (I'm glad I'm lactose intolerant right about now.)

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 106 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The fucking fuck. Are we supposed to import our god damn food now so it's safe to eat?

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Time to get on the bandwagon of ultra-pasteurized milk or re-boil your milk at home

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Ultra pasteurized" are just words on a carton unless there's someone verifying it.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

Source: People can print whatever they like on a carton. It's testers and regulators that recognize and punish them for making false claims.

[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 13 hours ago

They're not disputing ultra pasteurization, but due to the new lack of control implementation, it doesn't necessarily have to happen making it no different than the rush associated with regular milk.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I have terrible news for you. At least in my part of America, the only milk you can buy is ultra high pasteurized.

Of course, that's what they've been doing until now. Let's see what happens without the FDA on it.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

But now it’s not just milk and the legally allowed amount of blood, pus, urine, dirt, fecal matter, cleaning agents, and the things the ~~FDA~~ USDA found and did nothing about.
Now it’s an unambiguous statement that unknown quantities of unknown substances in your food will not trigger enforcement actions! (Regardless of the regulating body)

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That article cites USDA, not FDA

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 13 hours ago

Oh, you’re right - I recalled the article and just grabbed the first one that fit when I skimmed it.

I think my point that this is a clear message that the regulators are unable to regulate right now is still valid, but I will update my previous comment for clarity.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] piconaut@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

Yes, and pay the import tariff. I'm sure you can afford it since taxes are so low.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

That’ll be $276.43, and your card is automatically charged.

Thank you, Come again!

No returns.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] catchy_name@feddit.it 55 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The article doesn’t make this clear but “proficiency testing” is a “testing the testers” activity that ensures that labs’ procedures are working. So milk testing done by labs will still be done but those labs won’t be tested until this is resolved. Yes, the activity being stopped is important but a short stall shouldn’t immediately accept food safety.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you for being a voice of reason so I don't have to go insane today.

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

How long until I should go insane though? A month? Two weeks?

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

From working with lab equipment, you'd be surprised how quickly results turn to unreliable slop if not consistently calibrated. Is that what you're saying is being skipped?

The article really didn't do a good job of explaining. Would this be the equivalent of CAPP inspections where one lab will audit another?

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, it’s making sure people still know how to do their jobs that will be paused. If you work in a lab you have to do regular periodic training and then be tested on your ability to execute to those standards. Those tests of the lab workers are being paused until they’re in the new location. This is actually pretty common.

[–] ovalofsand@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That kind of expense is meant to ensure standardized practices, correct?

Trump thinks measure once cut once is more efficient.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

To some extent, but more so to ensure people actually absorbed the training.

So if you train people on shitty practices, then they can pass their competency tests doing shitty things really well!

The actual training (typically called SOPs - standard operating procedures / policies or some such thing) quality is generally what makes a bigger difference. Those are typically reviewed annually or on some timeline based on risk and volatility.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Now corporations can slide a few bucks to food safety testing labs and get past all these pesky regulations

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago

throw the fucking Russian cunts out ffs!

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 21 points 2 days ago

Guess it's time to stop consuming milk entirely, good job!

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago

Can't wait to find out we're putting formaldehyde in our milk again.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Suddenly glad to be lactose intolerant

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like everyone is about to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Lactose intolerance finally pays off

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Oh I'm sure this will end well...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

So much "efficiency".

Once again, when the brainless howler monkeys like Failin' Palin were talking about "death panels", it was projection. ALWAYS projection.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

An HHS spokesperson said the laboratory was already set to be decommissioned before the staff cuts and though proficiency testing would be paused during the transition to a new laboratory, dairy product testing will continue.

So NOT because of the cuts… but also WTF? Can we not continue enshitifying America?

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Where's Al Capone when you need him?

load more comments
view more: next ›