this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

22985 readers
3863 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Chuck Edwards’ North Carolina town hall erupted in chaos as constituents furiously protested DOGE, a Trump administration initiative tied to mass federal job cuts and Elon Musk’s growing influence.

Attendees, including laid-off government workers, jeered at Edwards over employment losses and reduced federal funding.

Constituents raised concerns about federal job cuts affecting veterans' services, national parks, and Hurricane Helene recovery efforts.

Edwards struggled to respond but remained unfazed. The GOP downplayed the unrest, calling it staged, though independent voters like veteran Martin Downie say they feel directly targeted by their own government.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Meanwhile, Stupidity knows no bounds. Meanwhile they will still vote for them.

We love our oppressors.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They were supposed to directly target OTHERS, not MEEEEEEE!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting."

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

turns out he was.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For anyone who is not familiar, Asheville is a very Left-leaning city in a deep red state. Last time I saw that many granola crunching hippies was in my mom's photo albums of the Haight-Ashbury district in '69. I'm not saying the town hall was full of Democrats, or that Asheville doesn't have its fair share of dyed-in-the-wool conservatives. I'm just saying that the general mindset in Asheville leans much further Left than the rest of NC, and that may explain why Edwards was getting so much shit from the public. Buncombe County (where Asheville is) voted 61% for Edwards' Democratic opponent Caleb Rudow in 2024.

Here's a pic I took of some graffiti while I was up there not long ago.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Fuck it. More graffiti. Some trippy cats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But others, like Downie, aren't necessarily on the left end of the political spectrum. He's a registered independent who served under presidents of both parties during his time in the Army.

"independent"

How to say you are voting Republican but not exactly proud about it...

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Nah, 100% fuck that. After I moved to where I live now I registered as an independent because after 23 years of being a democrat, I’m now embarrassed to say that about myself and I also largely disagree with their capitalist bullshit.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I guess it's good that non-political people are starting to get involved. Shame they didn't spend 5 minutes to check which way the wind was blowing in November last year.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Shame they didn’t spend 5 minutes to check which way the wind was blowing in November last year.

Which is especially weird, since they should've learned the importance of it from the wind in September.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They'll still vote for fascism. They're just angry it's impacting them directly.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the end it will always affect them directly. So they'll remain angry until they get half of a fucking clue about the issues.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So they'll remain angry until they get half of a fucking clue about the issues.

Then they'll be even more angry. I know I am.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I think the only way I could be associated with Texas is if the association included drunk. Hope you're doing okay.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Too bad there isn't a Dem that could really thrive at this moment of darkness for some good. 2016 Bernie's messaging would connect now more than ever but that time has passed. I'm glad Republican voters are mad, even if I bet it is just because they are being affected too, not really mad about the harm.

[–] sowitzer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Eh, probably need an old white guy. Walz or Newsome are the two who should be getting in the spotlight now. Then the Dems get a group of progressives who will back either of them to make some waves and say what they won’t. Dems need to be more unified and not go too crazy. Too many young people are MAGA inclined, no matter how left leaning they say.

But I’m just some guy. I’m sure they know better and it’s “her/his time” or whatever they want to push.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just a friendly correction, it's affected, not effected. Affected is a verb (which is how I remember).

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually it’s super confusing because they can both be verbs and they can both be nouns.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The easiest way to remember is the term "special effects".

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Too bad there isn’t a Dem that could really thrive at this moment of darkness for some good.

AOC seems to be having a moment. And Bernie seems to be in the recruitment phase for something, at least I hope he is.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And Bernie seems to be in the recruitment phase for something, at least I hope he is.

Don't expect much from Bernie on that front. He's a good progressive Senator, but he'll never actually lead a progressive movement. I don't know if he doesn't have it in him anymore or if he's just not that kind of guy, but Bernie works a lot better as a symbol than as a leader.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's already led two progressive movements.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 1 month ago

Led them to what?

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AOC seems to be throwing in with Bernie. Yes, Bernie is getting older, but with a sort of confirmed 'successor' may still have some bite..... as long as the Democratic party doesn't pull the same bullshit.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 1 month ago

I don't think you're getting me. Just voting for progressive candidates won't fix things. I don't know if there was any point where that was enough to fix things, but if there was it definitely isn't now. Therefore, Bernie—who did not, does not and will not recommend any method of resistance beyond simply voting—is incapable of leading a progressive movement. Bernie and politicians like him need an independent progressive movement behind them to win elections; if you put them in charge of the movement they'll sit around doing nothing for most of the year.