Doctor_Satan

I just don't see the point in calling ourselves a united nation if we aren't going to produce a minimum standard of educated workers across the board. Why not just Balkanize at that point?

And the US government banned words related to climate change from any future studies. If your grant proposal includes those keywords, it'll get denied automatically without a human even looking at it.

Anthropogenic climate change is real, whether you believe in it or not.

You know who believes in climate change? Fossil fuel companies, insurance companies, the military industrial complex, and every single politician talking about buying or taking Greenland by force. All the very same people who have spent the past half century publicly denying the existence of anthropogenic climate change. Not only do they believe in it, but they are designing their profit models around it at our expense.

I'm not saying some states are "too dumb". I'm saying some states are too poor, and the poor shouldn't be left to suffer compounding negative results because their citizens can't shoulder the burden of higher state taxes. Because I promise you that federal taxes will not go down. Once the government has gotten used to milking you for X amount, they aren't going to give up that cash flow. All that will happen is that poor states will just get worse and worse as education falls and they fail to produce a workforce qualified for anything other than menial labor.

We are too dumb to set our own standards!

It's not about being "too dumb". It's about having skills that transfer across state lines. There's a reason we don't let doctors and lawyers from other countries just set up a shop and start practicing in the US without meeting American standards first. Now imagine that happening from one state to the next. In your naive attempt to reduce the size of government, you've actually increased government bureaucracy and red tape by orders of magnitude.

And again, where are states going to make up that 15% of funding provided by the federal government?

The problem with this is that there ends up being no national education standard. You take a state like Alabama, which ranks dead last in so many education metrics, and remove those federal standards. Now Alabama can just change their state standards, and suddenly they have a 100% graduation rate with all straight A students. Guess what happens when Cletus the Alabama valedictorian tries to get a job in the medical field or the tech sector.

And that's before we ever even talk about funding. States get about 15% of their K-12 funding from the federal government. Where are the states going to make up that difference? Higher state taxes? Higher property taxes? Or are they just going to let already struggling schools go to shit? Guess who that affects the most?

You really haven't put a lot of thought into this beyond "federal gubmint bad".

I'm 50 and miserable. Everyone who isn't well off is miserable, and that's like 75% of the country.

The 99% Party. It's a slick way of calling it a worker's party without sounding like a communist party.

Does this unelected twat even have security clearance?

This is still a win for Project 2025. Not a full 100% win, but ground gained is ground gained.

Because Capitalism demands fealty to Capital. The only exception being if Capital puts on any kind of veneer of human decency. Then you are allowed to break out the pitchforks.

"Browncoats doing exactly what they are supposed to be doing; will be given a slap on the wrist if they are sloppy enough to get caught."

Fixed that headline for ya.