this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
1030 points (95.2% liked)

politics

25721 readers
3442 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Daggity@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Did I time travel to 2000?

[–] iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Jon needs to run as a Democrat, and he needs Colbert to be his running mate ars a Republican for teh lulz

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

God, I hope we can do better than Jon Stewart.

I love the guy, but a Bush Jr. era comic is not what we need right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 month ago

There are certainly worse candidates. Stewart still seems like he has a soul, unlike most republicans.

[–] owlboy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Whoa, this thread has the most comments I've ever seen on Lemmy, I think.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The fact that anyone still believes there will be anything resembling "fair" elections by 2028 is baffling to me.

The american capacity to stick their head in the sand as long as they have the newest gadget in front of their face and an endless stream of tiktok content to look at is fucking insane.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Eh, I trust Stewart's motivations, but not necessarily his judgment. I listened to him interview Ezra Klein and Stewart fell for his neoliberal Abundance bullshit without any pushback of critical thought. I could see him getting led astray by some of the same Democratic hacks that destroyed the party.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I’d vote for him twice.

[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why would he want to take the helm of this dumpster fire?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Last thing we need is another fucking celebrity in the office

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In the grand scheme of things I don't think Jon Stewart wouldn't be that different from Gavin Newsome as president. I'd prefer Stewart 100x more than Newsome, just on a personality level, but the direction of the office would be pretty much the same. Newsome is a slimeball but he's not the worst Dem option on the progressiveness & electable matrix. I'm pretty sure Stewert isn't to far from Newsome on the spectrum overall. I'd much rather have AOC personally. I think she's far to the left of either Jon and Newsome.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Newsom has been leaning into transphobia recently, he's a slimeball and I don't trust him to not throw the trans community under the bus for some bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›