this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
212 points (87.1% liked)

Technology

69891 readers
2622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

When lawyer Meetali Jain found a call from Megan Garcia in her inbox in Seattle a couple of weeks later, she called back immediately. Jain works for the Tech Justice Law Project, a small nonprofit that focuses on the rights of users on the internet. "When Megan told me about her case, I also didn’t know anything about Character.AI,” Jain says in a video call. "Even though I work in this area, I had never heard of this app.” Jain has two children of her own, eight and 10 years of age. "I asked my son. He doesn’t even have a phone, but he had heard about it at school and through ads on YouTube that specifically target young users. And then I realized that these companies are experimenting with our children without our knowledge.”

...

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Don't Date Robots!

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (24 children)

Well this is terrifying. It really seems like there is little to no regulation protecting kids online these days.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because all the laws that were pushed in the last twenty-five years for protecting children weren't actually about protecting children

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're all about increased conservative control over other people's kids

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And adults too. When you combine "the law says you can't offer this service to children or we'll destroy you" with "there's no way to reliably tell if the people we're offering this service to are children" the result is "guess we can't offer this service to anyone."

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

True. They start with the kids because they have no rights then expand once they have the foothold. We need to push back

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Thalion@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 week ago

That was a well written article

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›