this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

8729 readers
1420 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Clinton Floats $5,000 Baby Bond

~ September 28, 2007

It's nice to know these two are still in touch.

[–] dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, in a couple of years, some countries more than 50% of the population will be retired. Even a perfect democracy would not pass a law to improve young people’s lives so they can have time and money to have kids.

Just like in a perfect democracy, no affordable housing law will be approved because 66% of the population are homeowners.

Its unsolvable.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

5000 for diapers and clothes in the first (or any) year? How?

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Napkin math. A box of Huggies size 1 diapers sells at 10.50 for 32 diapers, or roughly 30 cents each. My newborn spoiled a diaper about 7 to 8 times a day on average, it let's easy say 2.50 a day, 356 days or about 912 dollars in diapers for the first year.

That doesn't count wipes, powder, up sizes as they grow. I suppose you could go premier diapers as well, but yeah there's probably an easy 3000 gap on clothes

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Why only after the baby is born? Is there something significant about the moment of birth or something?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] based_raven@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago

You can't clothe a baby for a year with $5k? We did it for basically fuck all. Had a load of stuff handed on from other parents, got some stuff from ebay and in sales. The fuck are you dressing the kid in, solid gold? Also how much is this person spending on diapers? There is no way you're spending $5k on nappies and clothes for a baby in one year, utter lunacy. Not that I agree with anything that Trump does, but this seems like a huge overreaction. I'm not from the US so I don't know how expensive this stuff is over there, but if it really costs this much to clothe one baby for a year then fuck me and I'm shocked.

[–] whitewashersmud@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Thanks, feminism.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

$5,000 will easily cover diapers, food (even if not breastfeeding), clothes, etc. for a year and more.

We can play with adding other costs, but kids can be way cheaper than paying "retail". FFS, toys, cribs, car carriers, all that shit is free, all day long. What we did pay for amounted to change, and then we sold it for change or donated it.

People have a kid, acquire all that stuff, and in a very short window suddenly have no use for it. You just about can't give it away. LOL, how many babies can wear the same one-piece until it's worn out? 10?! Our landlord's wife worked a charity for baby stuff. Gave us tons of goods, we gave it back.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›